![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan Smith wrote:
On 2006-09-04, Paul Tomblin wrote: In a previous article, Larry Dighera said: If US auto makers are to remain in business, they must cut costs, and those fat labor contracts are a prime source of cost. So, the reason They've also got to stop designing crap cars. My Toyota Corolla was built in Cambridge Ontario by Canadian Auto Worker union members, and it's so well built that they export them back to Japan. Meanwhile your average Ford, GM or Chrysler is a gas guzzling maintenance nightmare because Ford, GM, and Chrysler care more about keeping shareholders happy than investing money in research and design. You want to see unmaintainable? Try a Jaguar XJ12 some time. Dragging things back towards an aviation related theme, we're building a new winch for the glider club. Our old one is a bit long in the tooth, and uses the (excellent) Jaguar XJ6 4.2 litre straight 6. A great engine that's virtually indestructable. But we want to get a bit more power, so when an XJ12 showed up for scrap (a garage had collapsed on it crushing the roof) we decided to go for a new engine. The V12 in the XJ12 is also a great engine. But in the process of extracting it from the donor car, I had to wonder how routine services were done. We'll have no problem maintaining it because we've got rid of all the cruft (i.e. the car!) that surrounded the engine. But to get the front two spark plugs out (a routine maintenance job), you have to take the air conditioning compressor off! To get that off, in turn you have to take off parts of the cruise control system. To get the AC compressor off you would also have to discharge the AC system since the pipework would all have to be disconnected - not flexible hoses. Changing the spark plugs must have been an all day job - something on most other cars would take fifteen minutes tops. And with 100,000 mile spark plugs you should be doing this job every 5 or 6 years or less. In the mean time, the engineers were able to meet other design constraints such as fitting the engine and it's accessories into a limit space in the engine compartment. Sounds like a reasonable trade-off to me. John |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-09-07, John Theune wrote:
And with 100,000 mile spark plugs you should be doing this job every 5 or 6 years or less. When the donor car was made, gapping the spark plugs was an annual job. It's only relatively recently that you've been able to do that with spark plugs. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An ACE goes down in flames. | PoBoy | Naval Aviation | 25 | December 9th 05 01:30 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Piloting | 133 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |