A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NATCA Going Down in Flames



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 13th 06, 04:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames

In the article that I read, the FAA said that the napping had a
detrimental affect on performance. It meant the controllers were
groggy when returning to the scope.

So maybe the FAA has their own study.


If they do, I'm unaware of it. However, length of nap was important, as
well as when (and how) they were woken up. Being woken up in some
phases of sleep is better than others.

Jose
--
There are more ways to skin a cat than there are cats.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #2  
Old September 13th 06, 04:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
bdl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 139
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames


Jose wrote:
In the article that I read, the FAA said that the napping had a
detrimental affect on performance. It meant the controllers were
groggy when returning to the scope.

So maybe the FAA has their own study.


If they do, I'm unaware of it. However, length of nap was important, as
well as when (and how) they were woken up. Being woken up in some
phases of sleep is better than others.


So perhaps in a on-demand facility (where a terrorist incident might
require ATC to perform a lot of functions at a moments notice) is the
wrong place to be taking a nap where you might not be at peak
proficiency if your in the wrong phase of sleep.

Brian

  #3  
Old September 13th 06, 04:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames


"bdl" wrote in message
oups.com...

So perhaps in a on-demand facility (where a terrorist incident might
require ATC to perform a lot of functions at a moments notice) is the
wrong place to be taking a nap where you might not be at peak
proficiency if your in the wrong phase of sleep.


You're describing controllers working a position. We're not talking about
them. We're talking about controllers napping while on a break so that they
may be alert when they return to work a position.


  #4  
Old September 13th 06, 05:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
bdl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 139
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames


Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
You're describing controllers working a position. We're not talking about
them. We're talking about controllers napping while on a break so that they
may be alert when they return to work a position.


I want them alert BEFORE they return to work a position. I want them
at a minimum to be AWAKE when they are at the facility. On duty or on
break. If they've got nothing to do they can read the controller's
manual again. Or maybe the AIM. But in your world its too much to ask
that someone be required to be awake for a given predetermined 8 hour
shift.

It's as Jay suggested. If you think this type of attitude is going to
fly with the general public much less the pilot community when you
start complaining about privatization you're going to be surprised.

Most people would expect that someone at work could be expected to stay
awake.

  #5  
Old September 13th 06, 05:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames


"bdl" wrote in message
ups.com...

I want them alert BEFORE they return to work a position.


Then you want them permitted to nap while on break.


  #6  
Old September 13th 06, 07:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Allen[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 252
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"bdl" wrote in message
ups.com...

I want them alert BEFORE they return to work a position.


Then you want them permitted to nap while on break.


How long is the break period?

Allen


  #7  
Old September 14th 06, 03:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames


"Allen" wrote in message
...

How long is the break period?


It varies. On a night shift, when a nap would be most beneficial, it could
be several hours.

I used to trade into many night shifts when I was taking college courses.
We'd work together until the traffic died down to practically nothing,
usually about an hour into the shift which began at 10PM. Then one of us
would take a break for about three hours. On my break I'd study, my partner
would usually nap. Before the traffic would pick up, with about an hour
left in the shift, we'd be working together again.


  #8  
Old September 13th 06, 06:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Grumman-581[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 262
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames

"bdl" wrote in message
ups.com...
I want them alert BEFORE they return to work a position. I want them
at a minimum to be AWAKE when they are at the facility. On duty or on
break. If they've got nothing to do they can read the controller's
manual again. Or maybe the AIM.


I thought you wanted them *awake*... Reading the AIM is *not* conducive for
that...


  #9  
Old September 13th 06, 05:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames

So perhaps in a on-demand facility (where a terrorist incident might...

On the battlefield, this is a consideration. We are not on a
battlefield, despite what our president wants us to think.

Jose
--
There are more ways to skin a cat than there are cats.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #10  
Old September 13th 06, 05:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
bdl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 139
Default NATCA Going Down in Flames


Jose wrote:
So perhaps in a on-demand facility (where a terrorist incident might...


On the battlefield, this is a consideration. We are not on a
battlefield, despite what our president wants us to think.


They surely have a terrorist incident response plan. And part of a
plan to ground all aircraft (similar to 9/11) in the event of another
attack. One part of that plan might be that controllers on break are
required to be alert. Hence no naps.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An ACE goes down in flames. PoBoy Naval Aviation 25 December 9th 05 01:30 PM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 139 November 12th 03 08:26 PM
AOPA and ATC Privatization Chip Jones Piloting 133 November 12th 03 08:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.