![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
588 wrote:
Marc Ramsey wrote: ...they don't have to worry that some people sitting around a table three months later will arbitrarily change the rules on them. With respect, I wish the same could be said of the SSA. The SSA hasn't changed the OLC rules. They have added a capability to examine apparent rule breaking that did not previously exist in the OLC -- a standard and capability not so different from the process in contests -- and a standard any responsible organization must maintain. The contest standards are explicitly written into the contest rules, and are changed via a somewhat transparent process on a known schedule. The SSA-OLC standards are bit more murky, particularly when you consider that the "SSA Position Concerning FAR Violations on Badge, Record, and OLC Flights" is inconsistent with OLC "US Specific Rules", and both are inconsistent with certain actions that were apparently taken. Where's the beef? This is usenet, who needs beef? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 05:18 AM |
S-TEC 60-2 audio warning | Julian Scarfe | Owning | 7 | March 1st 04 08:11 PM |