A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

I want my SSA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 15th 06, 12:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Mike Schumann
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 539
Default Moving SSA? Why?

If you were looking for a new CFO, how many candidates are there in Hobbs,
or would be interested in relocating there? That's the real downfall of
being in such an obscure location.

Mike Schumann

"jb92563" wrote in message
ups.com...
How many people are actually planning to visit the SSA in the next year
no matter where it might be located?

I wonder how many would visit the SSA building if it was next door to
them?

I am asking myself is there some reason why I would want to visit....am
I missing something here?

Its just an administrative building with accountants, secretaries, and
some other committed individuals that are earning a living right?

Actually I'll bet the movers and shakers are mostly out of the office
rattling politicians cages and helping us glider pilots all over the
US.

So why all the talk about moving it? Hobbs is cheap...labor is cheap
and why take an airliner when you can fly a glider there ;-)

Lets just lend assistance putting it back in its proper place by
sending in our renewals early so they can pay the bills.

Help with your $$$ and leave strategic planning for another
day........priorities!

Ray



  #2  
Old September 19th 06, 06:32 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,096
Default Moving SSA? Why?

Mike Schumann wrote:
If you were looking for a new CFO, how many candidates are there in Hobbs,
or would be interested in relocating there? That's the real downfall of
being in such an obscure location.


I don't know, but I'll bet you haven't researched the job market in
Hobbs, either. Have you done the research for any of the other places
mentioned, like Elmira, Colorado Springs, or Chicago, and determined
what a CFO would cost? It might be easy to find a CFO on Hobbs if we
paid a Chicago salary. Besides, we only need one CFO, so it's not like
we're trying to staff a major corporation, and have to line up 500
applicants to have enough bodies to hire.

--
Note: email address new as of 9/4/2006
Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA

"Transponders in Sailplanes" on the Soaring Safety Foundation website
www.soaringsafety.org/prevention/articles.html

"A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org
  #3  
Old September 19th 06, 02:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jack[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Moving SSA? Why?

Eric Greenwell wrote:

Mike Schumann wrote:
If you were looking for a new CFO, how many candidates are there in
Hobbs, or would be interested in relocating there? That's the real
downfall of being in such an obscure location.


I don't know, but I'll bet you haven't researched the job market in
Hobbs, either. Have you done the research for any of the other places
mentioned, like Elmira, Colorado Springs, or Chicago, and determined
what a CFO would cost? It might be easy to find a CFO on Hobbs if we
paid a Chicago salary. Besides, we only need one CFO, so it's not like
we're trying to staff a major corporation, and have to line up 500
applicants to have enough bodies to hire.


Yeah, look how much we saved so far by having a Hobbs CFO.


Jack
  #4  
Old September 19th 06, 02:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
01-- Zero One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 114
Default Moving SSA? Why?

He was not from Hobbs.



-- zero one --











"Jack" wrote in message
m:

Eric Greenwell wrote:

Mike Schumann wrote:
If you were looking for a new CFO, how many candidates are there in
Hobbs, or would be interested in relocating there? That's the real
downfall of being in such an obscure location.


I don't know, but I'll bet you haven't researched the job market in
Hobbs, either. Have you done the research for any of the other places
mentioned, like Elmira, Colorado Springs, or Chicago, and determined
what a CFO would cost? It might be easy to find a CFO on Hobbs if we
paid a Chicago salary. Besides, we only need one CFO, so it's not like
we're trying to staff a major corporation, and have to line up 500
applicants to have enough bodies to hire.


Yeah, look how much we saved so far by having a Hobbs CFO.


Jack



  #5  
Old September 19th 06, 03:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jack[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Moving SSA? Why?

01-- Zero One wrote:

He [SSA CFO] was not from Hobbs.


The point is, SSA needs to be run just a little differently. Part of the
required new character of the organization should be to locate its
necessary physical headquarters in a place that is consistent with both
its responsibilities and its reason for existing.

A center of business, transportation, and soaring should be chosen. No
more hinterland locations, nor a retreat from the need to be able to
walk out the door and fly a glider of an afternoon. A location with a
connection to the development of soaring in the US would be a
significant advantage.

How many alternatives does that leave us? Very few, and none of them are
Hobbs NM.


Jack
  #6  
Old September 19th 06, 07:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Mike Schumann
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 539
Default Moving SSA? Why?

How about Stanton, MN, 30 miles south of Mpls?

Mike Schumann

"Jack" wrote in message
...
01-- Zero One wrote:

He [SSA CFO] was not from Hobbs.


The point is, SSA needs to be run just a little differently. Part of the
required new character of the organization should be to locate its
necessary physical headquarters in a place that is consistent with both
its responsibilities and its reason for existing.

A center of business, transportation, and soaring should be chosen. No
more hinterland locations, nor a retreat from the need to be able to walk
out the door and fly a glider of an afternoon. A location with a
connection to the development of soaring in the US would be a significant
advantage.

How many alternatives does that leave us? Very few, and none of them are
Hobbs NM.


Jack



  #7  
Old September 19th 06, 09:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default Moving SSA? Why?

Was he from San Quentin?


"01-- Zero One" wrote in message
. ..
He was not from Hobbs.

-- zero one --





"Jack" wrote in message
m:

Eric Greenwell wrote:

Mike Schumann wrote:
If you were looking for a new CFO, how many candidates are there in
Hobbs, or would be interested in relocating there? That's the real
downfall of being in such an obscure location.


I don't know, but I'll bet you haven't researched the job market in
Hobbs, either. Have you done the research for any of the other places
mentioned, like Elmira, Colorado Springs, or Chicago, and determined
what a CFO would cost? It might be easy to find a CFO on Hobbs if we
paid a Chicago salary. Besides, we only need one CFO, so it's not like
we're trying to staff a major corporation, and have to line up 500
applicants to have enough bodies to hire.


Yeah, look how much we saved so far by having a Hobbs CFO.


Jack



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.