A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flaps on take-off and landing



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 15th 06, 09:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Flaps on take-off and landing

Google for "Custer channel wing" to see what extreme effect
prop wash can have.



"Peter Duniho" wrote in
message ...
| "Mxsmanic" wrote in message
| ...
| [...]
| I'm surprised that propwash would matter, since the
airflow from the
| prop should stay in roughly the same place no matter
what the attitude
| of the aircraft.
|
| In addition to what's already been written, it's not true
that "the airflow
| from the prop should stay in roughly the same place".
Aircraft attitude
| affects relative wind, which in turn affects where the
airflow from the prop
| goes. This is a significant effect. As well, aircraft
attitude affects up-
| and down-wash from aerodynamic surfaces which also affects
where the airflow
| from the prop goes.
|
| Air moving back from the prop doesn't do so independently
of all the other
| air around the airplane. It mixes with, interacts with,
is affected by, and
| otherwise reacts to all the other air in response to
everything else that is
| going on.
|
| That is, it would be like putting a big fan on a
| sailboat to drive it forward.
|
| Depends. If you put the big fan at the front of the
sailboat and direct it
| rearward, you can not only propel the sailboat, if you put
a sail in the
| flow you can redirect the flow to accomplish different
things (though why
| you'd bother on a sailboat, I don't know).
|
| Likewise, in an airplane you can redirect thrust to
provide aerodynamic
| control. There is a very minimal reduction in the thrust
(as the
| redirection creates some drag, offsetting the thrust)
while the control
| surfaces get more air to work with. You are right to
think that you don't
| get something for nothing, but in this particular
situation, the cost (in
| drag) is insignificant compared to the improvement in
control effectiveness
| (from redirecting the prop thrust).
|
| As an extreme example, consider the airshow pilot who can
change the pitch
| attitude of his tailwheel airplane on the ground by
locking the brakes and
| using engine power and elevator control to raise or lower
the tail as he
| desires. The fact that the engine and prop are attached
to the airframe in
| no way prevents the thrust from the prop from being used
by the elevator to
| effect a pitch change.
|
| Pete
|
|


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.