|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
September 16th 06, 05:06 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE
"Bob Noel" wrote in message ... Why feed the troll? I find making sport of Skylune to be amusing. 
|
|
#2
September 16th 06, 10:53 AM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
|
The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE
In article . net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: Why feed the troll? I find making sport of Skylune to be amusing. Bah - it's too easy -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate
|
|
#3
September 16th 06, 03:11 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
|
The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE
"Bob Noel" wrote in message ... In article . net, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: Why feed the troll? I find making sport of Skylune to be amusing. Bah - it's too easy "Like shooting dairy cows with a scoped rifle" -- P.J. O"Rourke
|
|
#4
September 18th 06, 03:14 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
|
The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE
Can't argue the facts?
LOL. The subsidies are massive. I agree with the Bureau of Transportation statistics study. You, like the Destroyer, rely on rhetoric. Never quote any numbers, just silly arguments. The subsidies are obvious, yet all sorts of convoluted reasoning is used to deny the obvious: MASSIVE TAX SUBSIDIES to GA. Many studies besides the BTS study have reached this conclusion. Only advocacy groups, for obvious reasons, deny reality. BTW, here is what a "professional pilot" thinks about GA: http://www.generalaviationnews.com/e...index&-nothing
|
|
#5
September 18th 06, 03:48 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
|
The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE
"Skylune" wrote in message
lkaboutaviation.com... Can't argue the facts? Sure I can. Your facts are wrong. ORH (the airport I'm most familiar with) is not a GA airport, yet you insist on calling the grants there GA subsidies. The subsidies are obvious, yet all sorts of convoluted reasoning is used to deny the obvious: MASSIVE TAX SUBSIDIES to GA. See above Many studies besides the BTS study have reached this conclusion. Only advocacy groups, for obvious reasons, deny reality. So it's only reality when you decide? BTW, here is what a "professional pilot" thinks about GA: Couldn't care less.
|
|
#6
September 18th 06, 04:40 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
|
The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE
"Skylune" wrote in message lkaboutaviation.com... Can't argue the facts? LOL. The subsidies are massive. I agree with the Bureau of Transportation statistics study. It's a fact that you have yet to demonstrate a subsidy to GA. One must conclude that's because there isn't any.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The MYTT (Massive Yet Tiny) Engine | Harbin | Home Built | 19 | June 4th 06 07:06 PM |
| fuel subsidies for Angle Flight pilots | sashley | Piloting | 17 | September 11th 05 09:25 AM |
| Spark plug question: Massive electrode or fine wire? | Peter R. | Owning | 9 | February 4th 05 02:03 AM |
| General Zinni on Sixty Minutes | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 428 | July 1st 04 11:16 PM |
| Massive Israeli Flyover, Possible Trouble Nov 21 | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 8 | November 20th 03 04:05 AM |
Hybrid Mode
