A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Perils of Being A Celebrity Pilot



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 8th 04, 02:32 PM
Maule Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Wolfgang K."
just being curious when reading that from over here in austria..
are the faa really that strict and ground you for being at not a cleared
altitude - for whatever reason?

No, but busting a clearance in the busy New York City airspace will draw
attention. TEB underlies NYC Class B and specifically underlies some Newark
approaches. It is very busy, congested airspace.

Otherwise, it seems ATC radar is programmed to generate an alert with a 300
foot bust. I've done a number of those. It seems that it is up to the
controller to decide what to do.

From Mr Freeman's statements, it suggests that he is either relatively
inexperienced either in IFR ops or in ops at busy airports. He talks about
looking at the approach plate and deciding to descend to the altitude for
the approach. I'm guessing that at Teterboro, one would typically be
vectored and stepped down to intercept final. But that's just a guess.


  #2  
Old December 8th 04, 03:56 PM
Kai Glaesner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hello,

From Mr Freeman's statements, it suggests that he is either relatively
inexperienced either in IFR ops or in ops at busy airports. He talks

about
looking at the approach plate and deciding to descend to the altitude for
the approach. I'm guessing that at Teterboro, one would typically be
vectored and stepped down to intercept final. But that's just a guess.


IIRC he's got his PPL in 2002 and owned a Piper Arrow in 2003 (not a thing
to be used in FL210 ;-). So his IFR ticket could possibly be quite "fresh".

Regards

Kai Glaesner




  #3  
Old December 8th 04, 05:09 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Maule Driver ) wrote:

I'm guessing that at Teterboro, one would typically be
vectored and stepped down to intercept final. But that's just a guess.


Not based on my experiences in a Bonanza there over the summer. If
weather allowed, Teterboro would often use the VOR/DME-A approach (which
reads like it might have been the approach in use during Freeman's'
flight).

http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0412/00890VDA.PDF

NY Approach would vector aircraft to WANES at 3,000 ft, then clear the
aircraft for the approach at that point. Once cleared, obviously, the
aircraft was able to descend at the pilot's discretion upon crossing
WANES to 2,500.

When issuing the approach clearance, NY approach (again, based on
several flight into there over the summer) would often throw in an
additional requirement for smaller aircraft to cross CLIFO (the FAF) at
1,500, whereas the jet aircraft would receive the restriction to cross
CLIFO at 2,000.

--
Peter





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? Badwater Bill Home Built 3 June 23rd 04 04:05 PM
definition of "dual controls" Lee Elson Instrument Flight Rules 4 April 24th 04 02:58 PM
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 41 November 20th 03 05:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.