![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wolfgang K."
just being curious when reading that from over here in austria.. are the faa really that strict and ground you for being at not a cleared altitude - for whatever reason? No, but busting a clearance in the busy New York City airspace will draw attention. TEB underlies NYC Class B and specifically underlies some Newark approaches. It is very busy, congested airspace. Otherwise, it seems ATC radar is programmed to generate an alert with a 300 foot bust. I've done a number of those. It seems that it is up to the controller to decide what to do. From Mr Freeman's statements, it suggests that he is either relatively inexperienced either in IFR ops or in ops at busy airports. He talks about looking at the approach plate and deciding to descend to the altitude for the approach. I'm guessing that at Teterboro, one would typically be vectored and stepped down to intercept final. But that's just a guess. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
From Mr Freeman's statements, it suggests that he is either relatively inexperienced either in IFR ops or in ops at busy airports. He talks about looking at the approach plate and deciding to descend to the altitude for the approach. I'm guessing that at Teterboro, one would typically be vectored and stepped down to intercept final. But that's just a guess. IIRC he's got his PPL in 2002 and owned a Piper Arrow in 2003 (not a thing to be used in FL210 ;-). So his IFR ticket could possibly be quite "fresh". Regards Kai Glaesner |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maule Driver ) wrote:
I'm guessing that at Teterboro, one would typically be vectored and stepped down to intercept final. But that's just a guess. Not based on my experiences in a Bonanza there over the summer. If weather allowed, Teterboro would often use the VOR/DME-A approach (which reads like it might have been the approach in use during Freeman's' flight). http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0412/00890VDA.PDF NY Approach would vector aircraft to WANES at 3,000 ft, then clear the aircraft for the approach at that point. Once cleared, obviously, the aircraft was able to descend at the pilot's discretion upon crossing WANES to 2,500. When issuing the approach clearance, NY approach (again, based on several flight into there over the summer) would often throw in an additional requirement for smaller aircraft to cross CLIFO (the FAF) at 1,500, whereas the jet aircraft would receive the restriction to cross CLIFO at 2,000. -- Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | June 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
definition of "dual controls" | Lee Elson | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | April 24th 04 02:58 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |