![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Doug Haluza wrote: Oh, my, where to start? How about with your condisending tude? No, I'm saying the airplane was designed to handle flight and landing loads, based on it's max gross weight. These loads on the tail are only a fraction of it's weight. The glider can transfer most of the lifting force developed by the wing to the rope if a C.G. hook is used for aerotow. An aircraft with a design load limit of 4.4 G's will have an ultimate load limit 6.6 G's so a glider with a 1000 lb gross weight could deliver over 6000 lb of force, before the glider's wings failed. OK now focus here Doug, the math is not in dispute. The question is whether a glider could exert this force while on tow. After an upset, the towplane will enter an unrecoverable dive, and if the rope does not break, the speeds will quickly increase beyond maneuvering speed. But what makes you think the dive would be "Unrecoverable" just because the tow plane is past its manurering speed? You can't pull out of the dive if the glider is still attached to your tail by a rope that won't break. And if you have a Schweizer hook on the tail, it may not release after the upset because the pull is greater and may no longer be straight back. There have been several cases of upset where the tow pilot could not make the hook release, and the dive would have been unrecoverable if the rope did not break. Completely true statement.But, as the nose of the tow plane drops, this would change the angle on the release would it not?A couple of local pilots tried this (At altitude of course) and found this to be the case.Now at low altitudes, all bets are off of course.This is the beauty of the tost hook. Even if you tow with a Tost hook, you still need to react and operate the release. Doesnt this go without saying? I have to take issue with your previous post where you implied that a pilot could get away with aerobatics in a Super Cub as long as he wasnt doing "Tailslides".To coin your phrase this is "Ignorant Thinking".You should read my response to Baron 58Yankee on this one.I think that any aerobatics in a Super Cub should be discuraged. Most Respectfully Yours, KMU |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() KM wrote: OK now focus here Doug, the math is not in dispute. The question is whether a glider could exert this force while on tow. If both aircraft are in a steep dive from a high altitude upset, and the glider pilot panics and pulls the sitck, it certainly can. But it really doesn't matter--using a dockline as a tow rope means it won't break before one of the aircraft does. But what makes you think the dive would be "Unrecoverable" just because the tow plane is past its manurering speed? The dive after an upset will be unrecoverable as long as the glider stays attached to the towplane. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Winch Launch Stresses on Vintage Gliders | Mike Schumann | Soaring | 31 | January 30th 06 09:29 PM |
Blanik Weak Link for Winch Launch??? | Gary Emerson | Soaring | 6 | February 24th 04 08:08 PM |
Weak Dollar (Bad News - Good News) | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 6 | January 27th 04 03:06 AM |
Aviation Links Nov. 2 | DHeitm8612 | General Aviation | 0 | October 31st 03 01:50 PM |