![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jose" wrote in message
m... Planes like Arrows, Mooneys, Bonanzas, etc automatically move the rudder when you roll the ailerons. Dunno about the Mooney or Bo, but the Arrows I've flown do not have interconnect. You have full individual control of each of the three axis. What it =does= have is differential deflection of the alerons, which reduces adverse yaw. The only plane I know of that had interconnect is the Ercoupe. In addition, many airplanes are designed with Frise type ailerons, which also reduce adverse yaw by creating extra drag on the up-deflected aileron (to balance the drag on the down-deflected one). Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
In addition, many airplanes are designed with Frise type ailerons, which also reduce adverse yaw by creating extra drag on the up-deflected aileron (to balance the drag on the down-deflected one). Pete Is this the same as "differential" ailerons, more "up" travel than "down"? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
B A R R Y wrote:
Is this the same as "differential" ailerons, more "up" travel than "down"? Nope. An illustraion of a friese aileron is he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverse_yaw |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anno v. Heimburg wrote:
B A R R Y wrote: Is this the same as "differential" ailerons, more "up" travel than "down"? Nope. An illustraion of a friese aileron is he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverse_yaw THANKS! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"B A R R Y" wrote in message
m... In addition, many airplanes are designed with Frise type ailerons, which also reduce adverse yaw by creating extra drag on the up-deflected aileron (to balance the drag on the down-deflected one). Is this the same as "differential" ailerons, more "up" travel than "down"? Well, no. As Anno posted, it's something different. Interestingly, the post to which I replied was specifically talking about "differential" deflection, and my post specifically said "in addition". I think maybe the answer to your question could have been had through more careful reading. ![]() Pete |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
Interestingly, the post to which I replied was specifically talking about "differential" deflection, and my post specifically said "in addition". I think maybe the answer to your question could have been had through more careful reading. ![]() Or I possibly thought that the two weren't mutually exclusive and sought more information. Sorry I forced you to type an extra response. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 11:13 AM |
1-34 Rudder | DGRTEK | Soaring | 23 | February 16th 04 04:36 AM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |