![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Dohm wrote: What diameter of prop can you turn at 4000 rpm? A Volkswagen is NOT a good direct drive aircraft engine because it produces good power at 3200 to 3800 rpm. But it's a hell of a lot easier to put a redrive on a VW than an O-200. Actually, 46 to 48" The VW 1600 was used that way with considerable success in the early KR-2 aircraft. However, that only meant 60 to 65 HP with the small displacement, and the modestly oversized cylinders which would be fitted without fairly radical case machining provided only a very modest addition of take-off power. Cruising speed was only about 115 kts within the thermal capacity of the stock heads--which has been discussed previously in this NG--so pilots who were heavier or wanted to fly faster sought more oomph. Since VW engines in race cars and hot rods (sand rails, etc) operate under continuous power at higher power settings than this (I have driven Bugs up tall mountains in 90 degree weather at 25+ inches Hg at 3000-3700 rpm for as long as the mountain lasted, which was longer than enough to heat the head all the way through) this thermal analysis theory is flawed. The 356/912 Porsche has a head not much bigger and they run for hours on the Autobahn flat out. The difference is these engines have a cooling blower, where most aircraft installations run them as free cooled engines. Free air cooling and direct drive are simple. In the old A-65 and the airframes it went into that worked okay. But the time has come to recognize that for an airplane to not be something looked on as an antique, it needs a liquid cooled engine with a flywneel, redrive, single lever power control and enough power to haul fat people and lots of crap out of high and hot fields with healthy margins to spare. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Sep 2006 18:59:35 -0700, "Bret Ludwig"
wrote: Peter Dohm wrote: What diameter of prop can you turn at 4000 rpm? A Volkswagen is NOT a good direct drive aircraft engine because it produces good power at 3200 to 3800 rpm. But it's a hell of a lot easier to put a redrive on a VW than an O-200. Actually, 46 to 48" The VW 1600 was used that way with considerable success in the early KR-2 aircraft. However, that only meant 60 to 65 HP with the small displacement, and the modestly oversized cylinders which would be fitted without fairly radical case machining provided only a very modest addition of take-off power. Cruising speed was only about 115 kts within the thermal capacity of the stock heads--which has been discussed previously in this NG--so pilots who were heavier or wanted to fly faster sought more oomph. Since VW engines in race cars and hot rods (sand rails, etc) operate under continuous power at higher power settings than this (I have driven Bugs up tall mountains in 90 degree weather at 25+ inches Hg at 3000-3700 rpm for as long as the mountain lasted, which was longer than enough to heat the head all the way through) this thermal analysis theory is flawed. The 356/912 Porsche has a head not much bigger and they run for hours on the Autobahn flat out. The difference is these engines have a cooling blower, where most aircraft installations run them as free cooled engines. Free air cooling and direct drive are simple. In the old A-65 and the airframes it went into that worked okay. But the time has come to recognize that for an airplane to not be something looked on as an antique, it needs a liquid cooled engine with a flywneel, redrive, single lever power control and enough power to haul fat people and lots of crap out of high and hot fields with healthy margins to spare. totally clueless nonsense brown eyes. aircraft have a pressure plenum. almost no aircooled aircraft engine are free cooled engines. everything with a cowling uses the very effective technique of the pressure plenum. I'd suggest you learn about them. Stealth Pilot |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Stealth Pilot wrote: snip totally clueless nonsense brown eyes. aircraft have a pressure plenum. almost no aircooled aircraft engine are free cooled engines. everything with a cowling uses the very effective technique of the pressure plenum. I'd suggest you learn about them. Stealth Pilot The pressure plenum using ram air works at a given narrow range of power settings, airspeeds and outside temperature. Ever see what happens when a turbo Bonanza pilot at cruise pulls the power back and puts the nose down into the yellow arc? CRACK!!!!! go the jugs! PFM, although they had other problems, figured correctly that a blower with well-designed thermostatic controls worked a lot better. You couldn't shock cool one. The old Connies, DC7s, etc. did very well with sophisticated cowlings and high delta heat air cooled cylinder heads. But they were not aerobatic, had a flight engineer just to run the power plants, like a submarine, and the only sudden descents they dealt with were if they had a cabin depressurization. If that happened they didn't bitch that loudly at swapping out all four before the next flight-they swapped engines all the time at the ramp with passengers watching in those days. If the massive death count of the Bonanza tells us anything, besides that Beech management should have been shot at sundown on the ramp off Webb Rd, it' s that single pilot IFR needs single lever power control. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bret Ludwig wrote:
Stealth Pilot wrote: snip totally clueless nonsense brown eyes. aircraft have a pressure plenum. almost no aircooled aircraft engine are free cooled engines. everything with a cowling uses the very effective technique of the pressure plenum. I'd suggest you learn about them. Stealth Pilot The pressure plenum using ram air works at a given narrow range of power settings, airspeeds and outside temperature. Ever see what happens when a turbo Bonanza pilot at cruise pulls the power back and puts the nose down into the yellow arc? CRACK!!!!! go the jugs! PFM, although they had other problems, figured correctly that a blower with well-designed thermostatic controls worked a lot better. You couldn't shock cool one. The old Connies, DC7s, etc. did very well with sophisticated cowlings and high delta heat air cooled cylinder heads. But they were not aerobatic, had a flight engineer just to run the power plants, like a submarine, and the only sudden descents they dealt with were if they had a cabin depressurization. If that happened they didn't bitch that loudly at swapping out all four before the next flight-they swapped engines all the time at the ramp with passengers watching in those days. If the massive death count of the Bonanza tells us anything, besides that Beech management should have been shot at sundown on the ramp off Webb Rd, it' s that single pilot IFR needs single lever power control. Stupid, stupid, ignorant person. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jerry Springer wrote: snip Stupid, stupid, ignorant person. Yes you are, as you insist on proving repeatedly. Go back to your freak show on TV you load. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bert Ludwig wrote:
Jerry Springer wrote: snip Stupid, stupid, ignorant person. Yes you are, as you insist on proving repeatedly. Go back to your freak show on TV you load. Pudwig, the things you write here over and over show that you are an ignorant person. You are not smart enough to build your own airplane and find fault with anyone that does design and built airplanes. What a pathetic life you must live. You are not even smart enough to quote enough of the previous message so people well know what you are talking about. As I said YOU are a stupid, stupid person. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:46:26 GMT, Jerry Springer
wrote: Bert Ludwig wrote: Jerry Springer wrote: snip Stupid, stupid, ignorant person. Yes you are, as you insist on proving repeatedly. Go back to your freak show on TV you load. Pudwig, the things you write here over and over show that you are an ignorant person. You are not smart enough to build your own airplane and find fault with anyone that does design and built airplanes. What a pathetic life you must live. You are not even smart enough to quote enough of the previous message so people well know what you are talking about. As I said YOU are a stupid, stupid person. he certainly hasnt realised why I use the brown eyes comment :-) Stealth Pilot |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hard Starting Cold Continental Engines | M.E. Borner | Owning | 16 | December 6th 05 04:13 AM |
Continental IO-520A operating data? | Michael | Owning | 7 | November 26th 04 08:38 PM |
Continental A65-8 engines on EBAY | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 16th 04 04:30 AM |
Continental Airlines Complaint - A Newspaper article | John B. | Piloting | 40 | October 21st 03 04:07 PM |
Continental IO-360 question | Jeff P | Owning | 0 | September 21st 03 08:03 PM |