![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Remde wrote:
"Andy" wrote in message oups.com. Given the uncertainty of the actual official sunset time I repeat my request that SAA's sunset time be used only to determine the "end of soaring flight" and not used to determine the validity of the entire flight. I must respectfully disagree. If we just use sunset as the end of soaring flight that gives an unfair advantage to a pilot that is far from home or at altitude when the sun sets. He/she should have planned ahead and landed on time. I think calling sunset the end of soaring flight for the OLC is fine if the pilot is given a few minutes more to land. If the flight continues beyond that it could be considered sufficient evidence of poor planning, or bad faith, and the whole flight automatically disallowed. "SS + 0:05" might work for everybody in determining when to disqualify an entire flight, and not require the services of both defense counsel and a battery of astronomers just to mollify a nanny SSA-OLC. And who cares how far from home the pilot is? Let him land out and walk home, as long as the ship touched down within a few minutes of whatever "FAA Official Sunset" might have been at that place and time. There are no declarations necessary, nor is OLC an assigned task. Next thing we know, we'll be needing Official Observers. Jack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 05:18 AM |
S-TEC 60-2 audio warning | Julian Scarfe | Owning | 7 | March 1st 04 08:11 PM |