![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Mazor wrote:
"Judah" wrote in message . .. JohnSmith wrote in news:eaeRg.21555$eW5.17847 : Incorrect. It is an issue. Fatigued controller working a double shift without proper rest combined with the FAA violating their own staffing orders at KLEX. Irrelevant. Taking off and landing safely is the pilot's responsibility. The presence or absence of a tower, a controller, or even a runway is irrelevant. Really? Then why bother having them? Of course the crew had primary responsibility, although the anomalies in airport markings and notices and layout will play a role, too. The point about the ATC role goes to redundancy, not the crew's actions. If the controller had been able to stick to just one of his two jobs, he might have noticed the errant takeoff and warned the crew. There was a fairly recent posting in one of the aviation groups of exactly the same incident - same airport, same runways confused by a regional airliner crew - 13 years ago. The crew and the controller caught it at about the same time. This time neither did, but the controller couldn't have caught it because by then he was engaged in other duties - the job that should have been performed by the second (required) controller. This is not to excuse the crew's oversight, but redundancy is an essential pillar of our safety system. It's prevented far, far more accidents than have occurred. Redundancy failures often are part of the chain of events that has to occur before you actually get an accident. The secret to airline safety's excellent record is identifying the links that can make up such a chain, and fixing or preventing them. It is a HUGE issue. The word is Liability. Look it up. In the US, anyone can sue anyone for anything with pretty much no risk. For example, if it bothers you so much that there are black homosexuals in the FAA, you are certainly able to sue. The FAA has been successfully sued as part of post-acciident liabilities, and we're not talking chump change, either. Furthermore, there are other "liabilities" involved - the PR and political price to be paid when an FAA screw-up results in an accident, expecially one with many fatalities. Just please stop ranting about it here. Safety isn't his agenda here. To blame this accident on an FAA "social engineering" program is like saying that the reason that Johnny can't read is because he had to listen to a classroom discussion of African-American history. He's using a legitimate safety issue as an excuse to plaster aviation newsgroups with racist crap. FAA is cutting funding for Air Traffic controllers BUT they are continuing to fund social feel good meetings at Black only gatherings at Resort Spas. http://www.nbcfae.org/2006AnnualTraining.htm And do you really think that identifying that anomaly in FAA funding and staffing priorities makes a person racist? How do you define "Whistle blowing"? How do you define Discrimination? What is Reverse Racism to you? Define poor funding priorities in Air Safety? Did you know the FAA will not allow Anglo/Saxon only social groups? Is that not racist??? Did you know there are laws protecting whistle blowers especially if it involves safety of human life? What is more important for National Air Safety? Additional Air traffic Controllers or Black only social gatherings at resort spas?? Which one??? Don't have the balls to answer Mr.PC Brainwashed person?? No doubt you are Black or Gay or have been mind programmed so long by PC brainwashing that the identification of ANY minority SCAM makes that person automatically racist. You poor unable to form your own thought Government School educated brainwashed *******. Freedom has left your soul You are blinded by the PC God of Distortion Reminder- It is called Freedom of Speech here in America As long as the FAA discriminates against Anglo-Saxon Heterosexual males of European ancestry our group will not go away. EVER |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"BillClinton" wrote in message
.. . John Mazor wrote: To blame this accident on an FAA "social engineering" program is like saying that the reason that Johnny can't read is because he had to listen to a classroom discussion of African-American history. He's using a legitimate safety issue as an excuse to plaster aviation newsgroups with racist crap. FAA is cutting funding for Air Traffic controllers BUT they are continuing to fund social feel good meetings at Black only gatherings at Resort Spas. http://www.nbcfae.org/2006AnnualTraining.htm And do you really think that identifying that anomaly in FAA funding and staffing priorities makes a person racist? The way you have presented it, yes. How do you define "Whistle blowing"? How do you define Discrimination? What is Reverse Racism to you? What is racism? It's what we see here in your posted crap. Define poor funding priorities in Air Safety? The list of examples of, and reasons for poor funding prioritie in aviation safety is so long that the one item that you have a hard on for is insignificant. Did you know the FAA will not allow Anglo/Saxon only social groups? They also do not permit all-male hiring policies. So what? Exactly what is it that an all-Anglo-Saxon social group could accomplish that can't be done if non-Anglo-Saxons are allowed to be present? Is that not racist??? No. It tends to prevent racist activities. Duh. Did you know there are laws protecting whistle blowers especially if it involves safety of human life? Yes. So what? The story came to light, didn't it? What is more important for National Air Safety? Additional Air traffic Controllers or Black only social gatherings at resort spas?? So if FAA stopped that program, we'd have enough controllers? Or even more controllers? Bwha-wha-wha-wha! Gawd, your naivete is exceeded only by your racist cant. Arguing from your lack of political acumen is the Internet equivalent of bringing a knife to a gun fight. Don't have the balls to answer Mr.PC Brainwashed person?? I just did, Mr. Crow. No doubt you are Black or Gay or have been mind programmed so long by PC brainwashing that the identification of ANY minority SCAM makes that person automatically racist. When it's presented the way you have here, it's racism, not safety. You poor unable to form your own thought Government School educated brainwashed *******. You have done well, glasshoppah, to master the technique of cutting and pasting from "The Maroon's Guide to Racist Taunts and Other Irrelevant Answers" - I see many such examples in your posting. I particularly like your use of accusatory Items 6, 23, 31, and 61, and the ironic choice of your nom de Web here. I must, however, dock you points for omitting Item 4, where you would accuse me of being Jewish - confer with your anti-semitic colleagues on the advantages of that rant - and the ever-popular Item 9, where you would accuse me of being a paid shill for The eViL GuMMinT. So you only get a B-minus here, but don't let that discourage you in your quest for complete ignorance. Freedom has left your soul You are blinded by the PC God of Distortion Not only do I curse PC, I doubly curse maroons like you that gave rise to it. Reminder- It is called Freedom of Speech here in America Freedom of speech is both a two-edged sword, and our most precious freedom. It's a two-edged sword because it means that maroons like you have access to the marketplace of ideas, even if what you're peddling is the argumentive equivalent of rotten fish. It's our most precious freedom because of the heavy price we pay: letting maroons like you annoy us. As long as the FAA discriminates against Anglo-Saxon Heterosexual males of European ancestry our group will not go away. Close, but your Know Nothing argumentative skills still leave much to be desired. The correct answer is, "As long as loser maroons like you can manage to cover the cost of a third-hand computer and $10 a month in ISP charges to post anonymously (and, in your case, using identifiable sock puppets), then you and your ilk will continue to go trolling with outrageous crap that you may or may not actually believe." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 04 11:55 AM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |