![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mxsmanic wrote: Robert M. Gary writes: How do I know when the engine is potentially being stressed based on the instruments? Low manifold pressure? You use your POH book. If it says that 75% power at 10,000 feet requires 22" of manifold pressure and 2400 RPM , that's what you run. As a pilot you decide what power (percent) you want to run and how fast you want to get there. From there the POH will give you some choices of MP/RPM. Faster flying, quickly burns more fuel. You can't set the propeller pitch but you can adjust the propeller RPM. On the A36 and B58 I've been trying to fly, there's a lever that says pitch next to the throttle, and it has a feather setting (which I have never used), so I presume it's pitch of the propeller blades. Indirectly. The label is poor. The lever controls the RPM. The actualy pitch is controlled automatically. You set the RPM you want, the plane continuously adjusts the pitch to meet that. A typical training plane would not have this control. Is that just for reasons of economy, or does a rich mixture damage something in the engine? Leaning is also based on the power % you selected in the book. You car does the same. For the same RPM your car will set a higher mixture during acceleration vs. in freeway driving. Most planes have a EGT (exhaust temp ) to measure mixture, but you can do it just by sound in a more basic plane. Higher EGT = rich mixture? Higher EGT = peak temperature. So we speak of mixture in terms of peak. I might say "I run my plane 50 degrees rich of peak, but Bill runs his 25 lean of peak. Bob likes to run his at peak". Understood. My main concern is whether or not I'll get into trouble if I fail to do all the tweaking of engine parameters while flying. This is really more of a sim question. In real life when you transition a student to more complex aircraft (with all the controls you are speaking of) you discuss operations. Its much easier to understand from a practical point of view. You're approaching it academically which is harder to understand, especially w/o sitting one-on-one with a CFI. -Robert, CFI |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Exposed Electrical Wires in Boeing 737 Fuel Tanks! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | July 17th 06 06:13 PM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
C-172 Fuel | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | November 23rd 05 09:39 PM |
More long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids, with added nationalistic abuse (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 161 | September 25th 03 07:35 AM |
First flight tests of systems to mitigate fuel tank explosions | Peter Duniho | Piloting | 1 | July 16th 03 10:49 PM |