![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:06:53 GMT, "Dave Stadt" wrote:
The Nieuport 17 used the 110 hp LeRhone type J rotary. The prop was fixed to the case, the crank was attached to the airframe. The entire engine spun. http://www.pwam.org/gnomeng.htm I fully understand that the 'real' Nieuport 17 was powered by a rotary but in the movie they were radials not rotaries. You would think that for the ground shots they would have dummied up a rotary so at least the engine looked like it was turning. They didn't. To me this was a major flaw especially for a director who claims to have gone to extremes to assure accuracy. They apparently mostly used the flyable replicas for the ground shots. These were powered by VW engines, so they had a dummy "plate" attached on the inside of the cowling to look more closely like the "real" engines. It did look like a typical radial, but I suspect they were going for the rotary look. To the knowledgable eye, of course, they didn't look right. Due to the scarcity of rotaries, I didn't hold it against them...sure didn't expect them to partially disassemble a flyable aircraft just to install a fake rotary for a few seconds of ground shot. They *did* have an actual rotary on a stand, in one of the ground-maintenance sequences. Ron Wanttaja |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Wanttaja wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:06:53 GMT, "Dave Stadt" wrote: The Nieuport 17 used the 110 hp LeRhone type J rotary. The prop was fixed to the case, the crank was attached to the airframe. The entire engine spun. http://www.pwam.org/gnomeng.htm I fully understand that the 'real' Nieuport 17 was powered by a rotary but in the movie they were radials not rotaries. You would think that for the ground shots they would have dummied up a rotary so at least the engine looked like it was turning. They didn't. To me this was a major flaw especially for a director who claims to have gone to extremes to assure accuracy. They apparently mostly used the flyable replicas for the ground shots. These were powered by VW engines, so they had a dummy "plate" attached on the inside of the cowling to look more closely like the "real" engines. It did look like a typical radial, but I suspect they were going for the rotary look. To the knowledgable eye, of course, they didn't look right. Due to the scarcity of rotaries, I didn't hold it against them...sure didn't expect them to partially disassemble a flyable aircraft just to install a fake rotary for a few seconds of ground shot. They *did* have an actual rotary on a stand, in one of the ground-maintenance sequences. Ron Wanttaja And to *really* pick nits, when the maintenance guy rotated it, it looked like it had the mass of an 18" fan blade & no compression or friction resistance. :-) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charlie wrote:
Ron Wanttaja wrote: They *did* have an actual rotary on a stand, in one of the ground-maintenance sequences. And to *really* pick nits, when the maintenance guy rotated it, it looked like it had the mass of an 18" fan blade & no compression or friction resistance. :-) You kiddin? They went so far as to simulate bad rings on the "bad motor". Gotta be impressed! ;-) Mark "photorealism" Hickey |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Hickey" wrote in message ... Charlie wrote: Ron Wanttaja wrote: They *did* have an actual rotary on a stand, in one of the ground-maintenance sequences. And to *really* pick nits, when the maintenance guy rotated it, it looked like it had the mass of an 18" fan blade & no compression or friction resistance. :-) You kiddin? They went so far as to simulate bad rings on the "bad motor". Gotta be impressed! ;-) Mark "photorealism" Hickey More than likely missing sparkplugs. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron Wanttaja wrote: They *did* have an actual rotary on a stand, in one of the ground-maintenance sequences. And to *really* pick nits, when the maintenance guy rotated it, it looked like it had the mass of an 18" fan blade & no compression or friction resistance. :-) Hi Ron, I was once a volunteer custodian at a local museum that had a Le Rhone, I gave it a spin one day, to watch the valve action and to try to understand the ignition. Even with plugs in they spin pretty easy. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |