![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Luke wrote:
Hartzell recommends replacing the lord mounts with this conversion, according to one 210 owner who had it done. What do the Piper owners say? You definately need to plan on replacing the mounts. Lord makes a mount specific to the McCauley 3 blade installation and I believe that the installation kits include these new Lord mounts. Having recently installed a McCauley 3 blade on my PA24-250 I can tell you it is smoother and has less vibration than the old two blade. The climb is much better...I have to literally stomp on the brakes during run-up or it will drag me onto the runway. My cruise performance actually increased from 155 to 160 Kts. This is probably due to the new APP cowling (and full length nose gear doors) installed at the same time. For my installation the MaC 3 blade was really the least expensive choice as the the Hartzell alternatives (to eliminate the AD my prop had) were more expensive. Besides... look how many ADs Hartzell keeps coming up with. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Advancement of prop blade in flight, new information | Corky Scott | Piloting | 35 | August 28th 04 02:00 PM |
Survey - 3 blade prop conversion- Cockpit vibration, happy or not | Fly | Owning | 20 | June 30th 04 05:32 PM |
Hartzelll 3 blade prop | Matt Whiting | Owning | 6 | June 15th 04 01:29 AM |
3 blade prop position on 6cyl engine. | Paul Lee | Home Built | 3 | February 26th 04 12:47 AM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |