![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic,
Habsheim. BS! Point me to where the FBW does something the pilot doesn't. In Habsheim, the pilot did something the plane wasn't designed nor able to do, namely extremely low flight in a wooded area. His last words were probably along the lines of "Hey, watch this!". FBW had nothing to do with it. The accident report reflects this. There's a reason why they call it the Scarebus. Yes. That reason is called "Boeing Marketing Department". -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert writes:
BS! Point me to where the FBW does something the pilot doesn't. Habsheim. The pilot apparently put the throttles all the way forward, but the FADEC ignored this, because the aircraft was not in the right "mode." We don't know for sure because of tampering with the flight recorders, but this is one of several plausible scenarios. Normally, a pilot expects engines to spool up when he advances the throttle. But FBW systems do what they want, not what the pilot wants. In Habsheim, the pilot did something the plane wasn't designed nor able to do, namely extremely low flight in a wooded area. His last words were probably along the lines of "Hey, watch this!". I read the transcript, and those were not his last words, although I've forgotten what they were (and it's not certain that the published transcript actually reflects what was originally on the voice recorder). FBW had nothing to do with it. The accident report reflects this. FBW had everything to do with it. There were too many FBW systems aboard, and they were too complicated, and they worked in ways that were counterintuitive for an experienced pilot. When the pilot followed his instincts in an emergency situation, the FBW refused to follow. Yes. That reason is called "Boeing Marketing Department". The real reason why I prefer Boeing is the ten-day disappearance of those flight recorders. If the aircraft were so reliable, there would be no reason to sneak away with the hard data. Boeing has a long history of concern for safety and experience therewith that its main competitor does not share. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic,
but this is one of several plausible scenarios. A flat earth is one of several plausible scenarios to many people, too. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SWRFI - next weekend! | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 13 | May 10th 06 03:45 AM |
DG Rudder AD - DONE! - Notes from my work | ContestID67 | Soaring | 0 | March 30th 06 07:36 PM |
Southern California airports have worst runway safety records | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | November 26th 05 04:48 PM |
Information on A310 that lost it's rudder enroute to Canada from Cuba | Corky Scott | Piloting | 3 | March 27th 05 03:49 PM |
Rwy incursions | Hankal | Piloting | 10 | November 16th 03 02:33 AM |