A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 2nd 06, 10:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...

NW_Pilot writes:

The G1000 system If you buy one or intend to fly one in the Soup be current
and really proficient on you partial panel skill because in the event of a
G1000 failure or even partial failure you will be left with and Compass,
Altimeter, Attitude Indicator, and Airspeed Indicator and a bunch of useless
knobs and buttons or questionable reading from a partial failure.


Better still, just skip the G1000 in the first place.

I don't think it would cost Cessna much $$$ to put some manual back up
instruments in the panel even if they are the small ones they already charge
to much for a skyhawk why not add 3k or 4k if even that much to the price
and add some redundancy to the system!


Is a G1000 standard equipment, or can you opt for reliable avionics
instead?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #2  
Old October 2nd 06, 10:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
NW_Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 436
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
NW_Pilot writes:

The G1000 system If you buy one or intend to fly one in the Soup be
current
and really proficient on you partial panel skill because in the event of
a
G1000 failure or even partial failure you will be left with and Compass,
Altimeter, Attitude Indicator, and Airspeed Indicator and a bunch of
useless
knobs and buttons or questionable reading from a partial failure.


Better still, just skip the G1000 in the first place.

I don't think it would cost Cessna much $$$ to put some manual back up
instruments in the panel even if they are the small ones they already
charge
to much for a skyhawk why not add 3k or 4k if even that much to the price
and add some redundancy to the system!


Is a G1000 standard equipment, or can you opt for reliable avionics
instead?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.


It's an Optional Avionics Package!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
Logging approaches Ron Garrison Instrument Flight Rules 109 March 2nd 04 05:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.