A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 3rd 06, 11:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:16:50 -0700, "NW_Pilot"
wrote in
:

! I only
took note of the critical errors I tried my best to document them all but I
am not superman I still needed to fly the plane.


Was it not equipped with an auto pilot?

  #2  
Old October 3rd 06, 11:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...

Larry Dighera schrieb:

am not superman I still needed to fly the plane.


Was it not equipped with an auto pilot?


Probably linked to the G1000...
  #3  
Old October 3rd 06, 11:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Emily
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 230
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...

Stefan wrote:
Larry Dighera schrieb:

am not superman I still needed to fly the plane.


Was it not equipped with an auto pilot?


Probably linked to the G1000...


The 172 I flew with the G1000, it was linked.

Besides, after that avionics failure, I'm not sure I'd trust anything else.
  #4  
Old October 4th 06, 12:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
NW_Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 436
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...


"Emily" wrote in message
. ..
Stefan wrote:
Larry Dighera schrieb:

am not superman I still needed to fly the plane.


Was it not equipped with an auto pilot?


Probably linked to the G1000...


The 172 I flew with the G1000, it was linked.

Besides, after that avionics failure, I'm not sure I'd trust anything
else.



Yes, it was coupled to the G1000 and was useless!


  #5  
Old October 4th 06, 09:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 516
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...

On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:18:26 -0700, NW_Pilot wrote:

Yes, it was coupled to the G1000 and was useless!


Why?

The Garmin audio panel in our planes has a nifty feature. If the panel is
powered down, the pilot's headset is connected to COM1. Thus,
communication survives the failure of the audio panel.

They didn't do the same thing with the connectivity in the G1000 from
the sensors to the autopilot?

Are you sure that it wasn't the failure of the AHRS1 (which I saw in one
of your photos) which took out the AP? Not that this makes too much of a
difference to the pilot in your scenario, I suppose, but I'm growing quite
curious (in a negative way) during this thread regarding how the G1000 is
architected.

- Andrew

  #6  
Old October 4th 06, 11:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:01:55 -0400, Andrew Gideon
wrote in :

The Garmin audio panel in our planes has a nifty feature. If the panel is
powered down, the pilot's headset is connected to COM1. Thus,
communication survives the failure of the audio panel.


It would be interesting to know how VHF communications were affected
in Mr. Rhine's mishap.

  #7  
Old October 5th 06, 12:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
NW_Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 436
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:01:55 -0400, Andrew Gideon
wrote in :

The Garmin audio panel in our planes has a nifty feature. If the panel is
powered down, the pilot's headset is connected to COM1. Thus,
communication survives the failure of the audio panel.


It would be interesting to know how VHF communications were affected
in Mr. Rhine's mishap.


Ever time the system rebooted I had VHF comms for a few min + I had the Ham
Radio!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
Logging approaches Ron Garrison Instrument Flight Rules 109 March 2nd 04 05:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.