![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote
Personally, I think you'd have to be dumber than a box of rocks to pay that much for a Baron -- hell, you can get a nice biz-jet for less -- but there were apparently 17 people in 2005 that possessed the unique dual-qualities of "dumb enough to do it, and rich enough to afford it"... Yes....but, He has to get training and a check flight in that biz-jet every year....to fly the Baron, just a Flight Review in a Cessna 172 every two years. I've done Flight Reviews for a couple of guys who traded in their biz-jets for high performance twins just because of age, the jet training/check at Flight Safety became more than they could handle. Bob Moore |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Personally, I think you'd have to be dumber than a box of rocks to pay
that much for a Baron -- hell, you can get a nice biz-jet for less -- but there were apparently 17 people in 2005 that possessed the unique dual-qualities of "dumb enough to do it, and rich enough to afford it"... Yes....but, He has to get training and a check flight in that biz-jet every year....to fly the Baron, just a Flight Review in a Cessna 172 every two years. I've done Flight Reviews for a couple of guys who traded in their biz-jets for high performance twins just because of age, the jet training/check at Flight Safety became more than they could handle. Good point -- but my comment was more aimed at the price of a new Baron than at the quality of the pilots. I mean, my God -- $1.7 MILLION for a piston twin? Given what that would buy on the slightly-used market, it's just insane to give Raytheon that much money... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Oct 2006 07:59:38 -0700, "Jay Honeck" wrote:
Personally, I think you'd have to be dumber than a box of rocks to pay that much for a Baron -- hell, you can get a nice biz-jet for less -- but there were apparently 17 people in 2005 that possessed the unique dual-qualities of "dumb enough to do it, and rich enough to afford it"... Yes....but, He has to get training and a check flight in that biz-jet every year....to fly the Baron, just a Flight Review in a Cessna 172 every two years. I've done Flight Reviews for a couple of guys who traded in their biz-jets for high performance twins just because of age, the jet training/check at Flight Safety became more than they could handle. Good point -- but my comment was more aimed at the price of a new Baron than at the quality of the pilots. I mean, my God -- $1.7 MILLION for a piston twin? Given what that would buy on the slightly-used market, it's just insane to give Raytheon that much money... I agree. 1.7 Mil could buy you a whole collection of cool aircraft: P-51 Mustang T-6 Texan Cessna 195 Cessna 180/185 Pitts J-3 or Champ Bela P. Havasreti |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Personally, I think you'd have to be dumber than a box of rocks to pay that much for a Baron -- hell, you can get a nice biz-jet for less -- but there were apparently 17 people in 2005 that possessed the unique dual-qualities of "dumb enough to do it, and rich enough to afford it"... Yes....but, He has to get training and a check flight in that biz-jet every year....to fly the Baron, just a Flight Review in a Cessna 172 every two years. I've done Flight Reviews for a couple of guys who traded in their biz-jets for high performance twins just because of age, the jet training/check at Flight Safety became more than they could handle. Good point -- but my comment was more aimed at the price of a new Baron than at the quality of the pilots. I mean, my God -- $1.7 MILLION for a piston twin? Given what that would buy on the slightly-used market, it's just insane to give Raytheon that much money... It's all relative. A lot of folks think that about any airplane compared to a car. You can buy a ratty old airplane for $80,000 or a brand new Lexus that is 10 times more comfortably and have money left over for several nice vacations. Matt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 22:24:39 GMT, Matt Whiting
wrote in : You can buy a ratty old airplane for $80,000 or a brand new Lexus that is 10 times more comfortably and have money left over for several nice vacations. But, you're confined to two dimensions. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 22:24:39 GMT, Matt Whiting wrote in : You can buy a ratty old airplane for $80,000 or a brand new Lexus that is 10 times more comfortably and have money left over for several nice vacations. But, you're confined to two dimensions. Ok, so you mentioned the other advantage people often mention! Matt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Moore writes:
Yes....but, He has to get training and a check flight in that biz-jet every year....to fly the Baron, just a Flight Review in a Cessna 172 every two years. I've done Flight Reviews for a couple of guys who traded in their biz-jets for high performance twins just because of age, the jet training/check at Flight Safety became more than they could handle. How did age interfere with it? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |