A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #241  
Old October 5th 06, 03:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default Usenet Intimidation: (Was: NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...)

"Montblack" wrote in
:

("Judah" wrote)
Are you aware that the Jews have the monopoly on answering a question
with a question?



You don't say?


Montblack
5 of 7



Did you think that making a statement and putting a question mark at the
end counts as a question?
  #242  
Old October 5th 06, 03:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Judah writes:

Software that is certified by a regulatory organization typically is
held to a bit of a higher standard than the desktop software pushed
out by Microsoft.


Apparently the G1000 software is not certified in that way, or it
wouldn't be failing.


Their press releases claim that they are FAA certified.

  #243  
Old October 5th 06, 03:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Emily
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 230
Default Usenet Intimidation: (Was: NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight --All the scary details...)

Andrew Gideon wrote:
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 17:04:27 -0500, Emily wrote:

Eh, as a CFI, I really don't care where I sit.


Well...you've a solution, then. You can be in a relationship with a
pilot as long as he is not a CFI. You get right, he gets left, nothing
remains open for discussion.

I know several single male non-CFI pilots, if you're interested in an
introduction. However, I can provide no guarantees that any would never
achieve a CFI (which is a flaw in my little scheme, I admit).

rec.aviation.piloting.matches anyone?

Laugh


You guys are too funny.

Within 100nm of DAL, please.
  #244  
Old October 5th 06, 05:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:58:00 -0700, "NW_Pilot"
wrote in
:


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:01:55 -0400, Andrew Gideon
wrote in :

The Garmin audio panel in our planes has a nifty feature. If the panel is
powered down, the pilot's headset is connected to COM1. Thus,
communication survives the failure of the audio panel.


It would be interesting to know how VHF communications were affected
in Mr. Rhine's mishap.


Ever time the system rebooted I had VHF comms for a few min + I had the Ham
Radio!


So when the Garmin system went down, other than HF Communications
provided by a portable transceiver, and the flight controls, the only
other functional instruments and operable systems you had were the OAT
thermometer, EGT, magnetic compass, attitude indicator, altimeter,
intermittent tachometer and airspeed indicator? No navigation
equipment, auto pilot, VHF communications, fuel gages, engine oil
pressure nor temperature gages? Have I finally got it right?

  #245  
Old October 5th 06, 08:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...

Judah writes:

Their press releases claim that they are FAA certified.


Then the FAA doesn't know how to certify software (or doesn't bother
to do so), which would not surprise me at all.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #246  
Old October 5th 06, 08:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
NW_Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 436
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...




So when the Garmin system went down, other than HF Communications
provided by a portable transceiver, and the flight controls, the only
other functional instruments and operable systems you had were the OAT
thermometer, EGT, magnetic compass, attitude indicator, altimeter,
intermittent tachometer and airspeed indicator? No navigation
equipment, auto pilot, VHF communications, fuel gages, engine oil
pressure nor temperature gages? Have I finally got it right?


When the system went down the only things I had was My Portable GPS, HF Com,
Portable VHF Com, Steam Attitude Indicator, Steam Airspeed Indicator, Steam
Altimeter, Whiskey Compass! Every thing else was tied to the G1000 and was
useless or not to be trusted as accurate in that situation. They don't even
have a slip/skid ball in the thing when the G1000 goes blink that's
intergraded also!

I believe after this incident as we see the fleet of G1000 equipped aircraft
age in the next few years there will be many fatalities and/or class action
suite's and whole generation of pilots not prepared for this type of systems
loss!

I hope that this garmin problem never happens to another pilot (I have a
feeling it will and it makes me angry) I am glad I practice partial panel
and have been ferrying airplanes the last year and have gained the skills to
deal with problems such as this. I know it could have gone the opposite
direction really fast and I thank my lucky stars I was able to keep my cool,
work the problem, make the competent decisions and use the resources
available to me to make it in safe!

I like the Avidyne system a lot better at leased if the PFD & MFD fail you
have Comm's, Autopilot, And GPS Navigation all separate! But I only have 10
hours at the controls on a new Piper to make that opinion on the Avidyne
system witch is not enough!





  #247  
Old October 5th 06, 11:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Doug[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 248
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...

Before everyone jumps all over Garmin keep in mind that what caused
this was the auxilary fuel tank! It created a condition that the Garmin
unit could not handle. But the stock Cessna setup would never create
this condition! I think the real blame here has to be on the auxilary
fuel design. There are LOTS of these Garmin units out there working
very well, very few complaints at all. ALL of the new Cessnas have them
and they are WORKING!

Also keep in mind that the backup systems did work here. He was able to
fly the aircraft on the instruments he had.

NW_Pilot wrote:


So when the Garmin system went down, other than HF Communications
provided by a portable transceiver, and the flight controls, the only
other functional instruments and operable systems you had were the OAT
thermometer, EGT, magnetic compass, attitude indicator, altimeter,
intermittent tachometer and airspeed indicator? No navigation
equipment, auto pilot, VHF communications, fuel gages, engine oil
pressure nor temperature gages? Have I finally got it right?


When the system went down the only things I had was My Portable GPS, HF Com,
Portable VHF Com, Steam Attitude Indicator, Steam Airspeed Indicator, Steam
Altimeter, Whiskey Compass! Every thing else was tied to the G1000 and was
useless or not to be trusted as accurate in that situation. They don't even
have a slip/skid ball in the thing when the G1000 goes blink that's
intergraded also!

I believe after this incident as we see the fleet of G1000 equipped aircraft
age in the next few years there will be many fatalities and/or class action
suite's and whole generation of pilots not prepared for this type of systems
loss!

I hope that this garmin problem never happens to another pilot (I have a
feeling it will and it makes me angry) I am glad I practice partial panel
and have been ferrying airplanes the last year and have gained the skills to
deal with problems such as this. I know it could have gone the opposite
direction really fast and I thank my lucky stars I was able to keep my cool,
work the problem, make the competent decisions and use the resources
available to me to make it in safe!

I like the Avidyne system a lot better at leased if the PFD & MFD fail you
have Comm's, Autopilot, And GPS Navigation all separate! But I only have 10
hours at the controls on a new Piper to make that opinion on the Avidyne
system witch is not enough!


  #248  
Old October 5th 06, 11:32 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 578
Default NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...

Matt Whiting schrieb:

I'd prefer redundancy at both the sensor and instrument level if I was
flying IFR across the pond.


It was a *ferry flight* in an airplane which was not supposed to ever
fly over water again. You want full redundancy installed for one ferry
flight? Ok, just don't ferry fly then.

Stefan
  #249  
Old October 5th 06, 12:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Martin X. Moleski, SJ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 167
Default Usenet Intimidation: (Was: NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight -- All the scary details...)

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 02:02:31 GMT, Judah wrote in :

"Montblack" wrote in
:


("Judah" wrote)
Are you aware that the Jews have the monopoly on answering a question
with a question?


You don't say?


Montblack
5 of 7


Did you think that making a statement and putting a question mark at the
end counts as a question?


Are we really playing the question game here on r.a.p.?

Do you know how hard it is to keep answering a question
with a question?

What if someone slips and makes a direct statement
that isn't a question?

Will the game end?

Will the thread die?

Will there be film at 11?

Marty
  #250  
Old October 5th 06, 01:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ross Richardson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 91
Default Usenet Intimidation: (Was: NW_Pilot's Trans-Atlantic Flight --All the scary details...)

Emily wrote:
Andrew Gideon wrote:

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 17:04:27 -0500, Emily wrote:

Eh, as a CFI, I really don't care where I sit.



Well...you've a solution, then. You can be in a relationship with a
pilot as long as he is not a CFI. You get right, he gets left, nothing
remains open for discussion.

I know several single male non-CFI pilots, if you're interested in an
introduction. However, I can provide no guarantees that any would never
achieve a CFI (which is a flaw in my little scheme, I admit).

rec.aviation.piloting.matches anyone?

Laugh



You guys are too funny.

Within 100nm of DAL, please.



So, you are a Texan?

--

Regards, Ross
C-172F 180HP
KSWI
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
Logging approaches Ron Garrison Instrument Flight Rules 109 March 2nd 04 05:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.