On-field places to eat

"FLAV8R" wrote in message
...
Well I'm currently working on a shell that would be the framework for a
"Always Free" site.

I too gave him many reviews and pictures that I took of the different
places I visited.
And now I'm forced to pay for what I gave for free, not realizing at the
time that it would become a pay-per-view site.
I just hope that others will have faith in me and not be reluctant to
supply there favorite watering holes, restaurants and
such.

I have much of Central Florida covered from my own flying experiences but
I will need the help of others
for much of the rest of the country.

Here is a glimpse of what I'm working on
http://www.aviatordave.com/eatery/States001.html
keep in mind that it is a work in progress with much tweaking to be done.

And suggestions or ideas can be sent to
dlopez8aATyahooDOTcommmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

David - KGYH formerly of KORL


wrote in message
t...

On 8-Oct-2006, OP wrote:

Also, critical, is the date the
visit was made. Many of the on field restaurants out here tend to
change hands frequently with varying results in quality.

Ron

That's the main reason I recently dropped my membership in the Hundred
Dollar Hamburger site. I sent in a review and put in dates and times I
visited, and Mr. Purner stripped those from my review. He did not respond
to
my protestations. Without knowing how old the other reviews were, the
information seems pretty worthless to me. When I decided not to renew, I
wrote an e-mail to Mr. Purner telling him that was a major reason among
several other reasons why I was dropping my membership, and he only
responded to the other reasons I gave him, this one he ignored.
Scott Wilson

Good start. Wouldn't work in Firefox, but did with IE...

In article ,
"Robert Barker" wrote:

Good start. Wouldn't work in Firefox, but did with IE...

Looks like a neat idea, but the HTML is completely broken. (If it'll
only work in IE and nothing else, that's a good clue that it's screwed
up.)


Start he

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...dave.com%2Feat
ery%2FStates001.html


Write to standards, and *every* browser can parse it. Writing only for
(the very non-compliant) IE is a recipe for disaster.

"Beavis" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Robert Barker" wrote:

Good start. Wouldn't work in Firefox, but did with IE...

Looks like a neat idea, but the HTML is completely broken. (If it'll
only work in IE and nothing else, that's a good clue that it's screwed
up.)


Start he

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...dave.com%2Feat
ery%2FStates001.html


Write to standards, and *every* browser can parse it. Writing only for
(the very non-compliant) IE is a recipe for disaster.


Works fine in Opera, but I do agree. Make sure it is compatible with all of
the browsers...




---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0641-0, 10/10/2006
Tested on: 10/10/2006 10:18:15 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com

"C. Massey" wrote in message
. net...

"Beavis" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Robert Barker" wrote:

Good start. Wouldn't work in Firefox, but did with IE...

Looks like a neat idea, but the HTML is completely broken. (If it'll
only work in IE and nothing else, that's a good clue that it's screwed
up.)


Start he


http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...dave.com%2Feat
ery%2FStates001.html


Write to standards, and *every* browser can parse it. Writing only for
(the very non-compliant) IE is a recipe for disaster.


Works fine in Opera, but I do agree. Make sure it is compatible with all
of
the browsers...




Good argument for pure HTML and/or pure JAVA.

Peter

"Peter Dohm" wrote in message
. ..
Good argument for pure HTML and/or pure JAVA.

How does "pure JAVA" make it compatible with all browsers? Java is a
plug-in, not a built-in technology.