![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
E90 King Air, F90 King Air 200 King Air. The 300/350 is a
transport over 12,500 pounds and has to do it. "Emily" wrote in message . .. | karl gruber wrote: | Some can, easily. | | Name one light twin that can take off on one engine. | | Note: a 737 is not considered a light twin. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Macklin wrote:
E90 King Air, F90 King Air 200 King Air. The 300/350 is a transport over 12,500 pounds and has to do it. King Air's are not light twins. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Emily wrote:
Jim Macklin wrote: E90 King Air, F90 King Air 200 King Air. The 300/350 is a transport over 12,500 pounds and has to do it. King Air's are not light twins. Er, King Airs. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't you hate it when the spell check adds punctuation you
don't want? "Emily" wrote in message ... | Emily wrote: | Jim Macklin wrote: | E90 King Air, F90 King Air 200 King Air. The 300/350 is a transport | over 12,500 pounds and has to do it. | | King Air's are not light twins. | | Er, King Airs. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, they are, they do not require two pilots. They do
weight more than 6,000 pounds, but that just means the FAA requires an ability to climb at 5,000 feet. "Emily" wrote in message . .. | Jim Macklin wrote: | E90 King Air, F90 King Air 200 King Air. The 300/350 is a | transport over 12,500 pounds and has to do it. | | King Air's are not light twins. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Macklin wrote:
E90 King Air, F90 King Air 200 King Air. The 300/350 is a transport over 12,500 pounds and has to do it. You call those light twins? I call them turboprops. To me a light twin is one where you can't walk down an aisle inside... ie, smaller than cabin class. That means airplanes such as the Duchess, Seminole, Aztec, Seneca, C-310, etc. Compared to airliners, sure, I can see where you might consider a King Air a light twin. But very few of us get to start in one and yet I do have a bit of twin time, mostly in light twins and maybe a third of it in cabin class. I doubt any of them could get out of their own way on takeoff with only one fan turning. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I consider a high performance airplane as one that has
cruise speed above Va, because it requires a deft touch in a spiral recovery since you are always above the speed where you can break the airplane. You are trimmed for, let's say 175 and get into a spiral. By the time you discover the error and begin recovery you are 25-50 knots above Va. You do the recovery the way you were taught and pull power, level the wings and pull the nose up. You also die. The trim is going to do the pull up as you get the bank angle into the 30 degree or less range since you are very much above trim speed. The proper recovery in such a plane is pull the power, hold the wheel forward and level the wings, controlling the rate at which the nose comes up to control the G loads. That is my definition. But the FAA says that it is just anything with an engine over 200 hp. FAA Part 1.1 Large aircraft means aircraft of more than 12,500 pounds, maximum certificated takeoff weight. § 23.66 Takeoff climb: One-engine inoperative. For normal, utility, and acrobatic category reciprocating engine-powered airplanes of more than 6,000 pounds maximum weight, and turbine engine-powered airplanes in the normal, utility, and acrobatic category, the steady gradient of climb or descent must be determined at each weight, altitude, and ambient temperature within the operational limits established by the applicant with- (a) The critical engine inoperative and its propeller in the position it rapidly and automatically assumes; (b) The remaining engine(s) at takeoff power; (c) The landing gear extended, except that if the landing gear can be retracted in not more than seven seconds, the test may be conducted with the gear retracted; (d) The wing flaps in the takeoff position(s): (e) The wings level; and (f) A climb speed equal to that achieved at 50 feet in the demonstration of §23.53. In-flight acoustic measurements on a light twin-engined turboprop ... In-flight acoustic measurements on a light twin-engined turboprop airplane ... levels inside and outside the cabin of a twin-engined turboprop airplane. ... adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985bbn..reptQ....W - Similar pages Light Twin Performance Characteristics From the transitioning pilot's point of view, the basic difference between a light twin and single engine airplane is the potential problem involving engine ... avstop.com/AC/FlightTraingHandbook/LightTwinPerformanceCharacteristics.html - 7k - Cached - Similar pages [PDF] Subject: Pilot Transition Courses for Complex Single Engine and ... File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML Complex Single-. Engine Airplane Transition Training Syllabus. Light Twin-Engine Airplanes. The syllabus in figure 2 may be used for either of two purposes; ... www.airweb.faa.gov/.../rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/9fb4b32f92b4de56862569b9007093eb/$FILE/ATT4Q7X4/AC61-9B.pdf - Similar pages "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote in message ... | Jim Macklin wrote: | E90 King Air, F90 King Air 200 King Air. The 300/350 is a | transport over 12,500 pounds and has to do it. | | | You call those light twins? I call them turboprops. To me a light twin is one | where you can't walk down an aisle inside... ie, smaller than cabin class. That | means airplanes such as the Duchess, Seminole, Aztec, Seneca, C-310, etc. | | Compared to airliners, sure, I can see where you might consider a King Air a | light twin. But very few of us get to start in one and yet I do have a bit of | twin time, mostly in light twins and maybe a third of it in cabin class. I | doubt any of them could get out of their own way on takeoff with only one fan | turning. | | | | -- | Mortimer Schnerd, RN | mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com | | |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
King Airs probably could, if you could get them going straight in the
beginning. But no, it's a LIGHT TWIN, with conventional Lycoming 180HP engines. It's NOT a Piper. The 300/350 has to do it once past V1. And by definition you have to be past Vmcg, which might take Edwards AFB for the required runway length. King Air doesn't taxi well on one engine, BTDT. I have witnessed this airplane do it in relative safety. Somebody tried to do this once on purpose in a Lear Jet out of KPDX about 25 years ago. He didn't make it. Karl "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:zVYWg.2132$XX2.900@dukeread04... E90 King Air, F90 King Air 200 King Air. The 300/350 is a transport over 12,500 pounds and has to do it. "Emily" wrote in message . .. | karl gruber wrote: | Some can, easily. | | Name one light twin that can take off on one engine. | | Note: a 737 is not considered a light twin. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:zVYWg.2132$XX2.900@dukeread04... E90 King Air, F90 King Air 200 King Air. The 300/350 is a transport over 12,500 pounds and has to do it. The Twin Commander 690/695 series with the Dash-10 conversion is another series. Single engine ceiling with that series is over 20,000 feet. "Emily" wrote in message . .. | karl gruber wrote: | Some can, easily. | | Name one light twin that can take off on one engine. | | Note: a 737 is not considered a light twin. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Home Built Aircraft - Alternative Engines - Geo/Suzuki | OtisWinslow | Home Built | 1 | October 12th 05 02:55 PM |
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 10:14 PM |
P-3C Ditches with Four Engines Out, All Survive! | Scet | Military Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 01:09 AM |
U.S. Air Force Moves Ahead With Studies On Air-Breathing Engines | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 29th 03 03:31 AM |