![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote:
The author, Rick Durden, is a regular here, and a straight shooter. What he says in that article is 100% on the money. I agree completely. I was there too, and although I haven't been there as many times as Jay has, it was chaotic enough to really think about the risks involved. We were following two RV's who had no concept of the traffic pattern, how to hold altitude and speed at the same time, how to follow instructions, how to wait their turn, etc. I have no idea if they had the Notam, but in short, it was just a mess. That said, the FAA itself was largely to blame for much of the confusion over Rush and Green Lakes this year. (I know -- I was there.) If the controllers had only said "Guys, there's been an accident on the field, and we don't know how long the hold is going to be." -- half the planes holding would have diverted to other airports to wait it out. Yes, a little information would have gone a long way. I was about "that close" to bailing out of the holding pattern and going to land somewhere until the rush (no pun) died down. An estimate of the closure time would have been very helpful, and maybe a calming influence on the rabble. Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|