![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ballistic Recovery Chutes would primarily be an advantage in a low level
collision (i.e. in a traffic pattern). Are there any statistics on glider mid-airs that can shed some light on where most of the danger is? Mike Schumann "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message news:am_Wg.4860$YD.241@trndny09... Mike Schumann wrote: I don't know what the right answer is. Here in the US, there is a lot more power traffic than in Europe. Unless you are flying in contests or in high glider traffic areas, I suspect that the biggest risk is not other gliders, but power traffic. It's very frustrating that the FAA doesn't accelerate the deployment of ADSB here in the US. Then everyone could focus on developing cost effective technology that will cover all traffic. In the mean time, the best investment might be a ballistic recovery chute. In the Minden collision, the regular parachute worked just fine, and if he'd had an operating transponder, he'd likely not needed the parachute at all. A transponder and a TPAS unit will give you most of what you'd get from having an ADSB unit in your cockpit, more cheaply than an ADSB unit (or a ballistic parachute), and you can have it now. Powered traffic is already flying with transponders, so you don't have to wait for the rest of the fleet to buy into the idea. ADSB still doesn't protect you from aircraft that don't have them, and I don't think they will be any cheaper than a transponder. So, if powered traffic is your concern, I think there is decent solution. A ballistic recovery chute has some advantages, of course, but perhaps not in the typical collision which is usually high enough that a conscious pilot has time to get out. The problem is they are expensive to retrofit to most gliders, and then you have an untested system. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly "Transponders in Sailplanes" on the Soaring Safety Foundation website www.soaringsafety.org/prevention/articles.html "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Glider Crash - Minden? | Mitch | Soaring | 141 | September 13th 06 07:31 PM |
FLARM | Robert Hart | Soaring | 50 | March 16th 06 11:20 PM |
Flarm | Mal | Soaring | 4 | October 19th 05 08:44 AM |
Pilot statistics: SSA vs non-SSA | DrJack | Soaring | 6 | March 10th 04 05:55 PM |
Safety statistics | F.L. Whiteley | Soaring | 20 | September 4th 03 05:50 PM |