joining the traffic pattern quandary

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

The question, which you snipped: "The 45 degree turn to downwind
violates
the letter of the law regardless
what the FAA sayeth." violates which law?



Actually, the question was "Which letter of which law?" I did not snip
it.
And the statement was: "The 45 degree turn to downwind violates the letter
of the law regardless what the FAA sayeth"

Do you have such a hard time with reading comprehension, are do you just
enjoying being an asshole? You seem to play the role of parrot; I suppose
being a bureaucrat of sort is an approprate career for you.


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

And the statement was: "The 45 degree turn to downwind violates the letter
of the law regardless what the FAA sayeth"


Good. You've learned the diffeence between a question and a statement. I'm
glad to see we're making progress.



Do you have such a hard time with reading comprehension, are do you just
enjoying being an asshole?


Funny, I was questioning your reading ability. What do you believe I did
not comprehend?



You seem to play the role of parrot; I suppose
being a bureaucrat of sort is an approprate career for you.


You are a remarkably poor judge of character.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

And the statement was: "The 45 degree turn to downwind violates the
letter
of the law regardless what the FAA sayeth"


Good. You've learned the diffeence between a question and a statement.
I'm
glad to see we're making progress.

Stick in up your ass, ****bag.


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO