![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sam Spade" wrote in message news:IttXg.32427$tO5.4398@fed1read10... Why did you delete subparagraph (d)? (d) An air carrier, a commercial operator, and a pilot being used by the air carrier or the commercial operator-when conducting a passenger-carrying airplane operation under this part that is not a domestic type operation, a flag type operation, or a supplemental type operation-may operate at a land airport not certificated under part 139 of this chapter only when the following conditions are met: Too quick I guess. The missing part imposes the foregoing requirement on non-Part 139 land airports, which would be an unusual authorization. But, probably every airport Comair operates into is certified under Part 139; certainly LEX is. Exactly. In discussing Comair's attempted night departure from a dark runway you asserted that runway edge lights are mandatory for a night takeoff under Part 121, but the only such requirement in that part applies to airports at which Comair does not operate. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 04 11:55 AM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |