A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"License to taxi"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 15th 06, 12:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 291
Default "License to taxi"

Mxsmanic wrote
Which sends me off on a bit of a tangent again: John Travolta has a
707 of his own. How can he fly it without a copilot and engineer?


He can't and doesn't.

Bob Moore
  #2  
Old October 15th 06, 01:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default "License to taxi"

Bob Moore writes:

He can't and doesn't.


So he has to hire some veteran 707 pilots to go with him every time he
flies? Doesn't sound like much fun. Then again, I don't suppose
there are too many jet airliners that can be flown by one person.

I note also that the real estate development where he parks the plane
has a very fragile runway. I wonder how he manages to take off and
land on a runway that is composed of only two inches of asphalt.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #3  
Old October 15th 06, 01:33 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 291
Default "License to taxi"

Mxsmanic wrote
I note also that the real estate development where he parks the plane
has a very fragile runway. I wonder how he manages to take off and
land on a runway that is composed of only two inches of asphalt.


I can assure you that the runway is MUCH more substantial than
that. In the mid-80s. I was employed by the previous owner of
the development, Arthur Jones, inventor and manufacturer of the
Nautalis line of exercise equipment. He owned three B-707s which
we flew from that runway before it was lengthened to its present
length.

Do a 'google' for Terry Jones and Jumbolair....she flew as copilot
for me once. I was hired to train her for a B-707 Type Rating, but
quit before that happened...her husband was impossible to work for.

Bob Moore
  #4  
Old October 15th 06, 03:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default "License to taxi"

Bob Moore writes:

I can assure you that the runway is MUCH more substantial than
that. In the mid-80s. I was employed by the previous owner of
the development, Arthur Jones, inventor and manufacturer of the
Nautalis line of exercise equipment. He owned three B-707s which
we flew from that runway before it was lengthened to its present
length.


AirNav says this:

Surface: asphalt, in poor condition

FIRST 1800 FT OF RY 18 DETERIORATING WITH POT HOLES AND SEVERE
CRACKING.
1 ASPHALT SURFACE IS ONLY 2 INCHES THICK. PAVEMENT STRUCTURE CAN ONLY
SUPPORT LIGHT LOAD SINGLE WHEEL ACFT. HEAVIER ACFT MAY CAUSE IMMEDIATE
STRUCTUAL DAMAGE TO THE DETERIORATED SURFACE AND MAY GENERATE FOD.
RY 18/36 NOT CROWNED OR GRVD CAUSING STANDING WATER DURING AND AFTER
RAIN.

From this I inferred that the entire runway was just a thin layer of
asphalt.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #5  
Old October 15th 06, 02:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 291
Default "License to taxi"

Mxsmanic wrote
FIRST 1800 FT OF RY 18 DETERIORATING WITH POT HOLES AND SEVERE
CRACKING.
From this I inferred that the entire runway was just a thin layer of
asphalt.


Ah yes...That 1800' is the extansion that was added after I left,
and one of the reasons that I did leave.

At light weights, the original r/w was long enough to accommodate
the required accelerate/stop distance for a B-707, but not long
enough to reach Vmcg before reaching V1, so V1 had to be increased
to the higher Vmcg speed. Arthur Jones, although a pilot himself,
did not seem to understand this concept. We argued about the safety
issue. The Cuban pilot who replaced me seemed unaware of the issue.

In a Google Earth view, one can see that the extension (dark) was
added at an angle to the original (light) pavement. It was added
only to allow stopping from the higher (Vmcg) V1 speeds, and is
indeed marked as stopway with a displaced threshold. The displaced
threshold on the other end is to clear the rather high circular
concrete blast fence.

Bob Moore
  #6  
Old October 15th 06, 01:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Sylvain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 400
Default "License to taxi"

Mxsmanic wrote:

So he has to hire some veteran 707 pilots to go with him every time he
flies?


He can afford it. He still get to fly the aircraft, he can go wherever
whenever he wants; and it might actually be a reasonably fun post
retirement job for the copilot,

--Sylvain
  #7  
Old October 15th 06, 10:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default "License to taxi"

Bob Moore wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote
Which sends me off on a bit of a tangent again: John Travolta has a
707 of his own. How can he fly it without a copilot and engineer?


He can't and doesn't.

Bob Moore

As a matter of fact for the longest time he had no 707 type
rating. He was never pilot in command.
  #8  
Old October 15th 06, 11:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Emily
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 230
Default "License to taxi"

Ron Natalie wrote:
Bob Moore wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote
Which sends me off on a bit of a tangent again: John Travolta has a
707 of his own. How can he fly it without a copilot and engineer?


He can't and doesn't.

Bob Moore

As a matter of fact for the longest time he had no 707 type
rating. He was never pilot in command.


What's the point? If I had a 707 and his money, I'd sure work on
getting the rating!
  #9  
Old October 15th 06, 11:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default "License to taxi"

Emily wrote:
Ron Natalie wrote:
Bob Moore wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote
Which sends me off on a bit of a tangent again: John Travolta has a
707 of his own. How can he fly it without a copilot and engineer?

He can't and doesn't.

Bob Moore

As a matter of fact for the longest time he had no 707 type
rating. He was never pilot in command.


What's the point? If I had a 707 and his money, I'd sure work on
getting the rating!


If you had the time, but if since you can't fly the thing solo
anyhow, you have all the benefits and publicity of calling yourself
the pilot even though you're only SIC.


  #10  
Old October 15th 06, 11:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Emily
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 230
Default "License to taxi"

Ron Natalie wrote:
Emily wrote:
Ron Natalie wrote:
Bob Moore wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote
Which sends me off on a bit of a tangent again: John Travolta has a
707 of his own. How can he fly it without a copilot and engineer?

He can't and doesn't.

Bob Moore
As a matter of fact for the longest time he had no 707 type
rating. He was never pilot in command.


What's the point? If I had a 707 and his money, I'd sure work on
getting the rating!


If you had the time, but if since you can't fly the thing solo
anyhow, you have all the benefits and publicity of calling yourself
the pilot even though you're only SIC.


Me personally, I'd take the few weeks or whatever at Flight Safety. :-)

You're right though, I don't think the general public knows or cares...

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.