the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran

Al Smith wrote:
"Diplomatic buildup"? **** that, it won't work. Just nuke their sites
now or pay the price for a nuclear-armed terrorist state in the future.
Are YOUR balls big enough to deal with the threat, or do you advocate
appeasement?


How quaint.

Someone who thinks any sort of conflict short of all out nuclear war is
'apeasement'.

How stupid will you look if Iran already has nukes and one goes off in a
shipping container in New York City AFTER the US drops nuclear weapons on
them?


For that matter, how stupid does he look advocating the senseless
murder of hundreds of thousands of human beings?

Well they'd want to do the same to us, it's dog eat dog as far as I'm
concerned.

"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
oups.com...

Al Smith wrote:
"Diplomatic buildup"? **** that, it won't work. Just nuke their sites
now or pay the price for a nuclear-armed terrorist state in the
future.
Are YOUR balls big enough to deal with the threat, or do you
advocate
appeasement?


How quaint.

Someone who thinks any sort of conflict short of all out nuclear war
is
'apeasement'.

How stupid will you look if Iran already has nukes and one goes off in
a
shipping container in New York City AFTER the US drops nuclear weapons
on
them?


For that matter, how stupid does he look advocating the senseless
murder of hundreds of thousands of human beings?

Well they'd want to do the same to us, it's dog eat dog as far as I'm
concerned.

No.

At no time has any major Muslim figure in power in a nation state called for
the destruction of all non Muslims.

What they'd like is the West to go away. They'll settle for Coke and Levis
and computers (with no net connection) and all the technology but they'd
prefer us to keep things like democracy and free speech and female equality
to ourselves.

--
William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.

William Black wrote:
"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
oups.com...
Al Smith wrote:
"Diplomatic buildup"? **** that, it won't work. Just nuke their sites
now or pay the price for a nuclear-armed terrorist state in the
future.
Are YOUR balls big enough to deal with the threat, or do you
advocate
appeasement?

How quaint.

Someone who thinks any sort of conflict short of all out nuclear war
is
'apeasement'.

How stupid will you look if Iran already has nukes and one goes off in
a
shipping container in New York City AFTER the US drops nuclear weapons
on
them?

For that matter, how stupid does he look advocating the senseless
murder of hundreds of thousands of human beings?
Well they'd want to do the same to us, it's dog eat dog as far as I'm
concerned.

No.

At no time has any major Muslim figure in power in a nation state called for
the destruction of all non Muslims.

There are plenty of recordings of thousands of Iranians showing
"Death to America" on the orders of their leaders.

Andrew Swallow

"Andrew Swallow" wrote in message
...
William Black wrote:
"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
oups.com...
Al Smith wrote:
"Diplomatic buildup"? **** that, it won't work. Just nuke their
sites
now or pay the price for a nuclear-armed terrorist state in the
future.
Are YOUR balls big enough to deal with the threat, or do you
advocate
appeasement?

How quaint.

Someone who thinks any sort of conflict short of all out nuclear war
is
'apeasement'.

How stupid will you look if Iran already has nukes and one goes off
in
a
shipping container in New York City AFTER the US drops nuclear
weapons
on
them?

For that matter, how stupid does he look advocating the senseless
murder of hundreds of thousands of human beings?
Well they'd want to do the same to us, it's dog eat dog as far as I'm
concerned.

No.

At no time has any major Muslim figure in power in a nation state called
for
the destruction of all non Muslims.

There are plenty of recordings of thousands of Iranians showing
"Death to America" on the orders of their leaders.

There are plenty of recordings of Irish Americans shouting for the death of
the UK Royal Family on the orders of their leaders as well.

So?

--
William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.

Andrew Swallow wrote:
William Black wrote:
"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
oups.com...
Al Smith wrote:
"Diplomatic buildup"? **** that, it won't work. Just nuke their sites
now or pay the price for a nuclear-armed terrorist state in the
future.
Are YOUR balls big enough to deal with the threat, or do you
advocate
appeasement?

How quaint.

Someone who thinks any sort of conflict short of all out nuclear war
is
'apeasement'.

How stupid will you look if Iran already has nukes and one goes off in
a
shipping container in New York City AFTER the US drops nuclear weapons
on
them?

For that matter, how stupid does he look advocating the senseless
murder of hundreds of thousands of human beings?
Well they'd want to do the same to us, it's dog eat dog as far as I'm
concerned.

No.

At no time has any major Muslim figure in power in a nation state called for
the destruction of all non Muslims.

There are plenty of recordings of thousands of Iranians showing
"Death to America" on the orders of their leaders.

Andrew Swallow

Exactly. Some of the Iranian people must go for this **** otherwise
they wouldn't have elected Ahmadinejad. No-one outside of Iran will be
shedding a tear once the radioactive glow becomes apparent over Tehran.

In article ,
Andrew Swallow wrote:
William Black wrote:
"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
oups.com...
Al Smith wrote:
"Diplomatic buildup"? **** that, it won't work. Just nuke their sites
now or pay the price for a nuclear-armed terrorist state in the
future.
Are YOUR balls big enough to deal with the threat, or do you
advocate
appeasement?

How quaint.

Someone who thinks any sort of conflict short of all out nuclear war
is
'apeasement'.

How stupid will you look if Iran already has nukes and one goes off in
a
shipping container in New York City AFTER the US drops nuclear weapons
on
them?

For that matter, how stupid does he look advocating the senseless
murder of hundreds of thousands of human beings?
Well they'd want to do the same to us, it's dog eat dog as far as I'm
concerned.

No.

At no time has any major Muslim figure in power in a nation state called for
the destruction of all non Muslims.

There are plenty of recordings of thousands of Iranians showing
"Death to America" on the orders of their leaders.


And all reports say that Iranians, and the world in general, separate
the acts of our government from Americans as individuals. Iranians
are said to love American as individuals and respect American ideals.

To varying degrees, they want western culture and colonialism to leave
Persia and the Arabian peninsula alone. We (The US) has been screwing
up Iran since 1953.



--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m
Harrison for Congress in NY 13CD www.harrison06.com
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001

Darn Good Intelligence wrote:
Al Smith wrote:
"Diplomatic buildup"? **** that, it won't work. Just nuke their sites
now or pay the price for a nuclear-armed terrorist state in the future.
Are YOUR balls big enough to deal with the threat, or do you advocate
appeasement?

How quaint.

Someone who thinks any sort of conflict short of all out nuclear war is
'apeasement'.

How stupid will you look if Iran already has nukes and one goes off in a
shipping container in New York City AFTER the US drops nuclear weapons on
them?

For that matter, how stupid does he look advocating the senseless
murder of hundreds of thousands of human beings?

Well they'd want to do the same to us, it's dog eat dog as far as I'm
concerned.


You probably call yourself a Christian, too.

IOW, you are the enemy. Of all mankind.

Go to Hell, and take you kind with you.

Defendario wrote:
Darn Good Intelligence wrote:
Al Smith wrote:
"Diplomatic buildup"? **** that, it won't work. Just nuke their sites
now or pay the price for a nuclear-armed terrorist state in the future.
Are YOUR balls big enough to deal with the threat, or do you advocate
appeasement?

How quaint.

Someone who thinks any sort of conflict short of all out nuclear war is
'apeasement'.

How stupid will you look if Iran already has nukes and one goes off in a
shipping container in New York City AFTER the US drops nuclear weapons on
them?

For that matter, how stupid does he look advocating the senseless
murder of hundreds of thousands of human beings?

Well they'd want to do the same to us, it's dog eat dog as far as I'm
concerned.


You probably call yourself a Christian, too.

Look, I'm not calling for all muslims to be destroyed, just the ones
that want to destroy us and actively participate in plots to do just
that. Unfortunately it seems there are too many of these types of
brainwashed individuals in the M East.

And about Iran, I want to clarify that I am most definitely NOT calling
for Iran to be totally and utterly destroyed by nukes. What I am
calling for is the use of TACTICAL nukes on a number of sites where
Iran is working on nuke technology.

Anyone who knows anything about nukes knows there is a distinctiom
between *tactical* nukes that can destroy things within relatively
confined areas and big daddy nukes that take out entire cities.

On Iran we should use the tactical nukes on their facilities just to
shake them up a bit. That's all.

Darn Good Intelligence wrote:
Defendario wrote:
Darn Good Intelligence wrote:
Al Smith wrote:
"Diplomatic buildup"? **** that, it won't work. Just nuke their sites
now or pay the price for a nuclear-armed terrorist state in the future.
Are YOUR balls big enough to deal with the threat, or do you advocate
appeasement?

How quaint.

Someone who thinks any sort of conflict short of all out nuclear war is
'apeasement'.

How stupid will you look if Iran already has nukes and one goes off in a
shipping container in New York City AFTER the US drops nuclear weapons on
them?
For that matter, how stupid does he look advocating the senseless
murder of hundreds of thousands of human beings?
Well they'd want to do the same to us, it's dog eat dog as far as I'm
concerned.

You probably call yourself a Christian, too.

Look, I'm not calling for all muslims to be destroyed, just the ones
that want to destroy us and actively participate in plots to do just
that. Unfortunately it seems there are too many of these types of
brainwashed individuals in the M East.


They know who their enemies are. You are one.

And about Iran, I want to clarify that I am most definitely NOT calling
for Iran to be totally and utterly destroyed by nukes. What I am
calling for is the use of TACTICAL nukes on a number of sites where
Iran is working on nuke technology.


If you nuke a country, it will result in its destruction. It will
ignite a conflagration that will be impossible to contain, and one that
the US might well lose.

You ought to give this article a good read:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FL16Ak01.html

Anyone who knows anything about nukes knows there is a distinctiom
between *tactical* nukes that can destroy things within relatively
confined areas and big daddy nukes that take out entire cities.


Once the balloon goes up, there won't be much way to slow things down.

You don't really understand the nature of warfare or international
politics, I can see. If you think that Russia and China will sit idly
by while the UK/USreeL cabal gobbles up the resources of the Middle East
you are dreaming. If there is not one guy in a bar who can kick your
ass, I guarantee that there are two or three together who can, and will.

That's what were up against. Do the math.

On Iran we should use the tactical nukes on their facilities just to
shake them up a bit. That's all.


And there will soon be a whole lotta shakin' goin' on.

Defendario wrote:
Darn Good Intelligence wrote:
Defendario wrote:
Darn Good Intelligence wrote:
Al Smith wrote:
"Diplomatic buildup"? **** that, it won't work. Just nuke their sites
now or pay the price for a nuclear-armed terrorist state in the future.
Are YOUR balls big enough to deal with the threat, or do you advocate
appeasement?

How quaint.

Someone who thinks any sort of conflict short of all out nuclear war is
'apeasement'.

How stupid will you look if Iran already has nukes and one goes off in a
shipping container in New York City AFTER the US drops nuclear weapons on
them?
For that matter, how stupid does he look advocating the senseless
murder of hundreds of thousands of human beings?
Well they'd want to do the same to us, it's dog eat dog as far as I'm
concerned.

You probably call yourself a Christian, too.

Look, I'm not calling for all muslims to be destroyed, just the ones
that want to destroy us and actively participate in plots to do just
that. Unfortunately it seems there are too many of these types of
brainwashed individuals in the M East.


They know who their enemies are. You are one.

And about Iran, I want to clarify that I am most definitely NOT calling
for Iran to be totally and utterly destroyed by nukes. What I am
calling for is the use of TACTICAL nukes on a number of sites where
Iran is working on nuke technology.


If you nuke a country, it will result in its destruction. It will
ignite a conflagration that will be impossible to contain, and one that
the US might well lose.

You ought to give this article a good read:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FL16Ak01.html

Anyone who knows anything about nukes knows there is a distinctiom
between *tactical* nukes that can destroy things within relatively
confined areas and big daddy nukes that take out entire cities.


Once the balloon goes up, there won't be much way to slow things down.

You don't really understand the nature of warfare or international
politics, I can see. If you think that Russia and China will sit idly
by while the UK/USreeL cabal gobbles up the resources of the Middle East
you are dreaming. If there is not one guy in a bar who can kick your
ass, I guarantee that there are two or three together who can, and will.

That's what were up against. Do the math.

So you think that Russia and China would intervene on the behalf of the
Iranian lunatics? I don't think they'd dare.

On Iran we should use the tactical nukes on their facilities just to
shake them up a bit. That's all.


And there will soon be a whole lotta shakin' goin' on.

So you agree with me that it will happen then? What's your best guess
for when the Iranian nutcases will be attacked?