A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 15th 06, 10:15 PM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval,alt.politics.bush,us.politics
William Black[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 176
Default the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran


"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
ups.com...

William Black wrote:
"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
oups.com...

So you think that Russia and China would intervene on the behalf of

the
Iranian lunatics? I don't think they'd dare.


Would you bet your life?


Yes.


I wouldn't.

It's pretty obvious that the current US government isn't prepared to bet
yours.

The Russians and Chinese would kick up a big fuss if the U.S
attacks Iran but they wouldn't use military means to stop the U.S. That
would be WW3.


Exactly.

Saddam always was a menace, he invaded people and threw poison gas about.

Iran has never done anything more than the US has done in the past, indeed
they've been very careful never to excede what the US has done in the past.

After a nuclear attack on Iran Russia and China would almost certainly start
a campaign to marginalise the US internationally, and they'd get a lot of
support. I don't know if you noticed but the US isn't that popular at the
moment.

Ports all over the world would close to US shipping, attacks on US
embassies and tourists and US owned industrial plants. Along with
international boycots of US products plus China would dump all those
dollars.

World War III or a huge US depression...

Your choice...

--
William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.


  #2  
Old October 19th 06, 05:07 AM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval,alt.politics.bush,us.politics
jJim McLaughlin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive'build-up for war with Iran

William Black wrote:

As usual some thought provoking and interesing materal, which can best
be found by

SNIPS OF MUCH FOOLISH CHEST THUMPING BY BOTH "DEFENDARIO" AND "DARN GOOD
INTELLIGENCE"



After a nuclear attack on Iran Russia and China would almost certainly start
a campaign to marginalise the US internationally, and they'd get a lot of
support. I don't know if you noticed but the US isn't that popular at the
moment.

Ports all over the world would close to US shipping, attacks on US
embassies and tourists and US owned industrial plants. Along with
international boycots of US products plus China would dump all those
dollars.


Dump them where?

The only "victim" of a Russian or Chinese led "boycott" of the US or
attempt to marginalize would be the comlete implosion of the PRC's
economy, and the subsequent melt down of the domestic authority of the
PRC government.

How does the old line go, " If ypu owe the bank a mllion bucks ad ca't
pay ou are in trouble. If youowe the bak a illion bucks and can't pay,
the bank is in trouble."

The PC economy, and the PRC work force, can not risk edangering their
American markets.

World War III or a huge US depression...

Your choice...

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nations sending Iran to Security Council (for Israel via the US, of course!): NOMOREWARFORISRAEL Naval Aviation 1 July 13th 06 05:05 AM
Bush administration finalizes military attack on Iran [email protected] Naval Aviation 11 January 5th 06 09:38 AM
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! Malcolm Austin Soaring 0 November 5th 04 11:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.