A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 15th 06, 11:08 PM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval,alt.politics.bush,us.politics
William Black[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 176
Default the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran


"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
oups.com...

William Black wrote:
"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
ups.com...

William Black wrote:
"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
ups.com...

We can't tolerate the world's biggest state sponsor of terrorism

with
nukes. End of story.

Actually you do.

Pakistan is undoubtedly the biggest sponsor of state terrorism.

Citation?

Put the words "Pakistan" and "nuclear proliferation" into a search

engine
near you.

Who started the Taliban?


The Taliban started was a movement and a political party, not a
terrorist group. The ISI may have had some links with the Al-Qaida in
the past but now they're going to enable us to bring OBL to justice.
Pakistan is, therefore, a useful ally on the War on Terror.

You snipped the last bit.

Do LeT and JeM not count as terrorists?

I mean, I know they haven't killed any US citizens yet but JeM were without
doubt implicated in the recent plot discovered in London.

--
William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.


  #2  
Old October 16th 06, 01:24 AM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval,alt.politics.bush,us.politics
Darn Good Intelligence
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 22
Default the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran


William Black wrote:
"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
oups.com...

William Black wrote:
"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
ups.com...

William Black wrote:
"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
ups.com...

We can't tolerate the world's biggest state sponsor of terrorism

with
nukes. End of story.

Actually you do.

Pakistan is undoubtedly the biggest sponsor of state terrorism.

Citation?

Put the words "Pakistan" and "nuclear proliferation" into a search

engine
near you.

Who started the Taliban?


The Taliban started was a movement and a political party, not a
terrorist group. The ISI may have had some links with the Al-Qaida in
the past but now they're going to enable us to bring OBL to justice.
Pakistan is, therefore, a useful ally on the War on Terror.

You snipped the last bit.

Do LeT and JeM not count as terrorists?


We can rely on our great friend Musharaff to deal with them. It's in
safe hands.

  #3  
Old October 16th 06, 09:17 AM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval,alt.politics.bush,us.politics
William Black[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 176
Default the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran


"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
ps.com...

William Black wrote:
"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
oups.com...

William Black wrote:
"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
ups.com...

William Black wrote:
"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
ups.com...

We can't tolerate the world's biggest state sponsor of

terrorism
with
nukes. End of story.

Actually you do.

Pakistan is undoubtedly the biggest sponsor of state terrorism.

Citation?

Put the words "Pakistan" and "nuclear proliferation" into a search

engine
near you.

Who started the Taliban?

The Taliban started was a movement and a political party, not a
terrorist group. The ISI may have had some links with the Al-Qaida in
the past but now they're going to enable us to bring OBL to justice.
Pakistan is, therefore, a useful ally on the War on Terror.

You snipped the last bit.

Do LeT and JeM not count as terrorists?


We can rely on our great friend Musharaff to deal with them. It's in
safe hands.

You forgot the smiley face.

They're his boys. Paid for by him, trained by him and they have camps on
land in Pakistan provided by him.

That's before we get to Dawood Ibrahim, a senior terrorist figure wanted by
the USA and living almost openly in Pakistan in a government housing
compound.

--
William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nations sending Iran to Security Council (for Israel via the US, of course!): NOMOREWARFORISRAEL Naval Aviation 1 July 13th 06 05:05 AM
Bush administration finalizes military attack on Iran [email protected] Naval Aviation 11 January 5th 06 09:38 AM
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! Malcolm Austin Soaring 0 November 5th 04 11:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.