![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Tom Conner posted:
"Neil Gould" wrote in message Sorry, but it's your usage of the example that is completely wrong. The Navy is not using MSFS *in lieu* of flight training, the point under discussion here. The poor reading comprehension skills of posters on this group never ceases to amaze me. Nobody said the Navy is using MSFS in lieu of flight training. I was responding to the completely wrong statement that "30 minutes in the air is worth hundreds of hours behind a game." If that was the only comment you were responding to, then you should have clipped the rest. The inclusion of other comments implies that you were responding to *the post*, not some fragment therein, and it is quite reasonable that a reader would assume as much. Reading comprehension is helped by clear messages. Neil |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Neil Gould" wrote in message news ![]() Recently, Tom Conner posted: "Neil Gould" wrote in message Sorry, but it's your usage of the example that is completely wrong. The Navy is not using MSFS *in lieu* of flight training, the point under discussion here. The poor reading comprehension skills of posters on this group never ceases to amaze me. Nobody said the Navy is using MSFS in lieu of flight training. I was responding to the completely wrong statement that "30 minutes in the air is worth hundreds of hours behind a game." If that was the only comment you were responding to, then you should have clipped the rest. The inclusion of other comments implies that you were responding to *the post*, not some fragment therein, and it is quite reasonable that a reader would assume as much. Reading comprehension is helped by clear messages. Okay. This is the entire post I responded to: " Intro flights are typically well below $100. I've already logged nearly a hundred hours in my simulated Baron, for far less money than that. But you have not flown for even one minute. 30 minutes in the air is worth hundreds of hours behind a game. " Again, reading comprehension in this group is abysmal. I wonder if it carries over to the pilot population in general? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Tom Conner posted:
Okay. This is the entire post I responded to: " Intro flights are typically well below $100. I've already logged nearly a hundred hours in my simulated Baron, for far less money than that. But you have not flown for even one minute. 30 minutes in the air is worth hundreds of hours behind a game. " Again, reading comprehension in this group is abysmal. I wonder if it carries over to the pilot population in general? Is it? 1) We are not mind readers. We can only base our understanding on what you choose to present. 2) Although you now state that the above is the "entire post" you responded to, it includes a comment to a previous post (mine regarding the cost of intro flights). Therefore, it was reasonable to think that my comment is somehow relevant. My comment had to do with the benefits of actual flight experience in comparison to *only* sim time, as that is the underlying subject of this thread. 3) It is reasonable to presume that responders to a thread are on-topic, unless otherwise clarified. The original topic was established with the comment, "While no mention has been made of a physical issue that would prevent him from working, he has not made that a point as to why he will not fly planes..." Your post was about people who *do* fly planes, and thus my comment distinguishing between the original subject and your new topic is apparently a correct interpretation. 4) According to your above statement, my comment is not relevant to your point at all, and should have been excluded from your excerpt. Instead, you went further and tied your post to the original topic with your comment, "Not to encourage the village idiot..." To make matters worse, you included my comment *again* in your current message. So, what about my comment were you responding to, given that I don't see anything regarding the cost of intro lessons? If that is your idea of clear writing, then it's a small wonder that you think that others can't read. Neil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Metatrivia: Third highest ever posts to r.a.p happened last month. | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 14 | October 12th 06 02:17 AM |
Please Ignore Mxsmanic | Terry | Piloting | 45 | September 29th 06 08:26 PM |