A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

MXSMANIC - The posts don't add up



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old October 18th 06, 07:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mortimer Schnerd, RN[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 597
Default MXSMANIC - The posts don't add up

Mxsmanic wrote:
Emily writes:

140 an hour dual really isn't *that* much higher than in the US.


It is only slightly less than I earn in a week.



With some training you could be advanced to burger flipper in a year or two.
Then you'll be rolling in cash.




--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com


  #122  
Old October 18th 06, 08:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steve Foley[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 119
Default MXSMANIC - The posts don't add up

He also quoted an incorrect formula showing something less than 2 Gs in a 60
degree bank.


"swag" wrote in message
ups.com...
I believe that the "wrong math" citation that everyone is alluding to
was when he posited that if the probability of one engine failing was
1/1000 then a single engine plane's chance of turning into a glider was
1/1000, but a twin's chance of turning into a glider was 1/1000000,
although the chance of a twin losing an engine was 1/500. Our more
mathematically correct and esteemed colleagues cited the exact formula
(which would correct the 1/500 to 1/500- 1/1000000). I believe that
any engineer worth his salt would call the second term negligible.


John Theune wrote:
Steve Foley wrote:
"John Theune" wrote in message
news:BAKXg.9272$ms1.6478@trndny05...

However I've also seen him write on detailed medical and mathematical
subjects and he has demonstrated a fair amount on knowledge.

I can't comment on his medical knowledge, but in the mathematical

subjects I
recall, he applied the wrong formula for a given situation.

Pretty mach the same thing he does in aviation matters.


True, he was wrong there also, but he knew enough math to make it appear
reasonable ( and wrong ) Not what I would expect from a minimum wage
earning person. If he had that level of knowledge/training he should be
able to get a better job. I know from what I've seen over the years at
work the ability to be right is not required for getting a job, it's
much more knowing the lingo. I'm sure you run into clueless people at
work before also. One wonders how they keep their jobs but its not
terrible surprising how they got them.
Bottom line is I don't buy his line of poverty as a reason to not learn
more about flying from a professional or even by himself from purchased
book.




  #123  
Old October 18th 06, 09:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 368
Default MXSMANIC - The posts don't add up


Mxsmanic wrote:
Kev writes:
I guarantee that your view would change in this case.

People guaranteed me all sorts of things in the past, too. They were
still wrong.

You see, almost everyone who first flew, had misconceptions
similar to yours.

I heard this, too. A lot of people are stupid. But I'm not.


LOL. I actually can't decide if you're A) a computer program, B)
an 80 year who's stuck in his ways, or C) a 15 year old who's not very
socially adept.

Your income and naïveté point to all of them :-)

Ah well, I"m still hoping someone can take you for a flight someday.

Cheers, Kev

  #124  
Old October 18th 06, 10:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 516
Default MXSMANIC - The posts don't add up

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:03:10 +0000, Neil Gould wrote:

Whereas with flight training, you become convinced that you know the
answers and never bother to ask.

Wrong, yet again. You have to learn the answers to the elementary
questions you're asking well prior to getting a certificate, and in our
flight school, well before you can even solo.


And even after once is licensed, one is still a student. Thus the
"license to learn" label.

- Andrew

  #125  
Old October 18th 06, 10:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 516
Default MXSMANIC - The posts don't add up

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:52:40 -0700, Kev wrote:

I guarantee that your view would change in this case.


That is a losing bet. You're assuming a personality interested in
learning. There's no evidence of that.

Rather, we see evidence of opinions formed with bad information and then
retained despite any contrary evidence. We see valuation of an opinion
formed from nothing but games as equivalent (or superior) to opinions
formed from actual experience.

I've no difficulty believing that nothing ever causes this poster to learn
anything that involves correcting misunderstandings.

- Andrew

  #126  
Old October 18th 06, 11:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 368
Default MXSMANIC - The posts don't add up


Andrew Gideon wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:52:40 -0700, Kev wrote:

I guarantee that your view would change in this case.


That is a losing bet. You're assuming a personality interested in
learning. There's no evidence of that.

Rather, we see evidence of opinions formed with bad information and then
retained despite any contrary evidence. We see valuation of an opinion
formed from nothing but games as equivalent (or superior) to opinions
formed from actual experience.


That describes virtually everyone the 'net, especially when it comes to
say, political arguments. Neither side often gives in and admits a
mistaken belief.

big grin

I think everyone's just frustrated, because they really want him to
understand.

Kev

  #127  
Old October 18th 06, 11:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Emily
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 230
Default MXSMANIC - The posts don't add up

Jon Woellhaf wrote:
Emily has remarked a couple times about her inability to fly a MS-type
flight simulator without crashing it.

Emily,

I would be very interested to know how you'd do in a full motion simulator
like the airlines use.

Jon



I've flown a full motion 727 sim a few times and did fairly well (this
was before I got my multi). Not within standards by any means, but I
never crashed it.
  #129  
Old October 19th 06, 02:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default MXSMANIC - The posts don't add up

Marty Shapiro writes:

Hmmm. A teen age high school drop out earns significantly more than
that at an entry level position with McDonalds.


In the United States, perhaps. In France, it works out about the
same. It's a job that pays minimum wage, and it is only part-time.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #130  
Old October 19th 06, 02:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default MXSMANIC - The posts don't add up

Mortimer Schnerd, RN writes:

With some training you could be advanced to burger flipper in a year or two.
Then you'll be rolling in cash.


With a bit of offshoring, you could be in the same position in a year
or two.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Metatrivia: Third highest ever posts to r.a.p happened last month. Jim Logajan Piloting 14 October 12th 06 02:17 AM
Please Ignore Mxsmanic Terry Piloting 45 September 29th 06 08:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.