![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob Chilcoat" wrote:
OK, AOPA wasn't much help, other to say, "just don't overfly Governor's Island". That's probably as good as you need to stay out of trouble. OTOH, I just looked at their graphic for the NOTAM, and it's clearly wrong. It looks like the graphic ends at the southwestern tip of Roosevelt Island, not Governor's Island, which makes it look like you can go almost as far up the East River as you used to be able to. I sent them a note pointing out the error. Just contact ATC before you get close and you don't need to worry about the exact line. Ron Lee |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron's reply says it all... Call em 5 minutes before you enter the
area... This is eyewash by the FAA to keep the foam-at-the-mouth-15-second-soundbite-politicians at bay... The FAA is actually being a GA friend on this issue (rare stance for them) by doing as little as is politically necessary... Push will come to shove on a gorgeous weekend, after the weather has been scummy for weeks and everybody is desperate to go flying, and when the GA pilot makes the request to fly up the river the controller, who feels he is too busy, says ":Aircraft calling remain clear of my airspace" OK, so is the VFR corridor his airspace? Well, according to my reading of the regs, NO... He is not in control of the VFR airspace underneath the Class B... The ruling issued by the FAA says, VFR aircraft must be in contact with ATC... He is in contact with ATC... As I read the FAR's the GA pilot says, "Roger", dials up 1200 on his transponder, and continues on his tour of NY... denny |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Denny" wrote: [snip] OK, so is the VFR corridor his airspace? Well, according to my reading of the regs, NO... He is not in control of the VFR airspace underneath the Class B... The ruling issued by the FAA says, VFR aircraft must be in contact with ATC... He is in contact with ATC... As I read the FAR's the GA pilot says, "Roger", dials up 1200 on his transponder, and continues on his tour of NY... what about the "postive control" part? -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the GA pilot makes the request to fly up the river the controller, who
feels he is too busy, says ":Aircraft calling remain clear of my airspace" OK, so is the VFR corridor his airspace? Well, according to my reading of the regs, NO... He is not in control of the VFR airspace underneath the Class B... The ruling issued by the FAA says, VFR aircraft must be in contact with ATC... He is in contact with ATC... As I read the FAR's the GA pilot says, "Roger", dials up 1200 on his transponder, and continues on his tour of NY... That probably wouldn't "fly" with the FAA. I believe they've always interpreted "two-way radio communications" to have been established when the controller responds to your call by using your tail number. Also, the exact text of the NOTAM states: "...UNLESS AUTHORIZED AND BEING CONTROLLED BY ATC." You are neither authorized nor being controlled in your example. -- Guy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
East River turning radius | Gary Drescher | Piloting | 106 | November 9th 06 05:17 PM |
The East River VFR corridor is now history | Peter R. | Piloting | 40 | October 27th 06 12:49 AM |
AS/MEL now need ATC permission over East River | Gary Drescher | Piloting | 13 | October 15th 06 01:41 AM |
Second Helicopter Crash into the East River | Bob Chilcoat | Piloting | 2 | June 21st 05 08:50 AM |
How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |