![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the GA pilot makes the request to fly up the river the controller, who
feels he is too busy, says ":Aircraft calling remain clear of my airspace" OK, so is the VFR corridor his airspace? Well, according to my reading of the regs, NO... He is not in control of the VFR airspace underneath the Class B... The ruling issued by the FAA says, VFR aircraft must be in contact with ATC... He is in contact with ATC... As I read the FAR's the GA pilot says, "Roger", dials up 1200 on his transponder, and continues on his tour of NY... That probably wouldn't "fly" with the FAA. I believe they've always interpreted "two-way radio communications" to have been established when the controller responds to your call by using your tail number. Also, the exact text of the NOTAM states: "...UNLESS AUTHORIZED AND BEING CONTROLLED BY ATC." You are neither authorized nor being controlled in your example. -- Guy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
East River turning radius | Gary Drescher | Piloting | 106 | November 9th 06 05:17 PM |
The East River VFR corridor is now history | Peter R. | Piloting | 40 | October 27th 06 12:49 AM |
AS/MEL now need ATC permission over East River | Gary Drescher | Piloting | 13 | October 15th 06 01:41 AM |
Second Helicopter Crash into the East River | Bob Chilcoat | Piloting | 2 | June 21st 05 08:50 AM |
How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |