Marketing and the Cirrus Sales Pitch

Recently, Mxsmanic posted:

Kingfish writes:

I think the G1000 has become standard equipment on both planes now

But can you get them without the G1000, with more reliable avionics?

With enough money, you can get whatever you want. However, to go way back
to an earlier discussion, there is no evidence that suggests that a G1000
is less reliable than traditional gauges.

Neil

Neil Gould writes:

With enough money, you can get whatever you want. However, to go way back
to an earlier discussion, there is no evidence that suggests that a G1000
is less reliable than traditional gauges.

I'll wait 15 years or so for the evidence to accumulate, and then
we'll see. In the meantime, someone else can be the pioneer and take
the risks.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:39:34 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:

I'll wait 15 years or so for the evidence to accumulate, and then we'll
see. In the meantime, someone else can be the pioneer and take the risks.

You'll be sure to let us know when you're willing to take the risk of
actually flying an airplane.

"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:39:34 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:

I'll wait 15 years or so for the evidence to accumulate, and then we'll
see. In the meantime, someone else can be the pioneer and take the
risks.

You'll be sure to let us know when you're willing to take the risk of
actually flying an airplane.

We should live so long.

Andrew Gideon writes:

You'll be sure to let us know when you're willing to take the risk of
actually flying an airplane.

Probably when I can buy one of my own and see to it that it is
perfectly maintained.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

No such animal.

mike

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message

perfectly maintained.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.