![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Neil Gould" wrote I don't think that the sales numbers would suffer from the inclusion of traditional spin recovery techniques. Perhaps I'm a real oddball type of pilot, but I am not impressed by the 'chute, given the injuries and deaths that have resulted from its use. Are you aware of any fatal accidents where the chute was deployed at sufficient altitude for proper opening? -- Jim in NC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Morgans posted:
"Neil Gould" wrote I don't think that the sales numbers would suffer from the inclusion of traditional spin recovery techniques. Perhaps I'm a real oddball type of pilot, but I am not impressed by the 'chute, given the injuries and deaths that have resulted from its use. Are you aware of any fatal accidents where the chute was deployed at sufficient altitude for proper opening? So, now you want to qualify the conditions of its use? ;-) I almost excluded the "...deaths..." part when I wrote my opinion, but then I figured that if the plane is capable of spin recovery, it could possibly do so below the altitude that the 'chute would work. If so, then those moments would be better spent trying to recover from the spin. Neil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|