A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19  
Old October 26th 06, 01:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default Why no plywood monocoque homebuilts?


Ernest Christley wrote:
wrote:

If you designed an aircraft to leverage modern production lines, what
would it be made of?

Thanks!
Matt


Fairy dust 8*)
You have to consider the economics of the thing. Modern assembly lines
are set up and expected to produce hundreds of thousands/yr if not
millions/yr of a product. We're talking a yearly volume on the scale of
the entire US GA fleet. One airplane for every registered pilot. The
most you could hope with any airplane design is more on the order of
100s/yr. The type of tooling you speak of takes as much R&D as an
airplane design. All that cost has to be amortized somewhere in a
reasonable amount of time. You very quickly get to the point where you
can roll off airplanes that have never been touched by human hands, but
they're so expensive to pay for the tooling that no one can afford them.


I understand your argument, and it is absolutely valid. But humor me
for a moment, and lets assume that a market could be found. Call me an
optomotrist, but I think there might still be a market, even if the
pilots don't exist at the moment.

And just having the work done by a machine doesn't get you home free.
Machines break. They are usually out of calibration, and they rarely
work as designed the first time. So now you're paying people to watch
the machines. Machines that makes airplanes that can't be sold any
faster than it took the people to make the machines.


Understood. But speculation is the inbred half stepbrother of
invention, (or something), and I might speculate that their is an
abundance of machines being discarded as modern factories go to third
and fourth generation robotics, and that much of it can be had for a
song.


SA gave a tour of the Cirrus factory a month or two back. I think they
have it right. Automate the simple things. Have humans do the
complicated things. Design the airplane with the lowest possible parts
count. I suspect that they will slowly add more automation as the
capitol budget allows.


What parts did they automate?

-Thanks!
-Matt

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
compound curves in plywood BA-100 Home Built 58 April 13th 05 05:29 AM
cvjetkovic ca-65 skyfly- plywood spar? patrick mitchel Home Built 3 October 16th 04 05:26 PM
Air Conditioning System for Homebuilts? JPAviation Home Built 18 February 6th 04 03:24 AM
Homebuilts by State Ron Wanttaja Home Built 14 October 15th 03 08:30 PM
Substitute for Mahogany plywood Kelvin & Janice Rempel Home Built 1 September 5th 03 08:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.