![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
: I don't think you understand. Class C services are provided to all
: aircraft within the Class C airspace itself, and to all participating : aircraft in the outer area associated with it. The outer area is not marked : on the chart, it is normally the area within a twenty mile radius of the : Class C primary airport and extends from the lower limits of radar/radio : coverage up to the ceiling of the approach control's delegated airspace : excluding the Class C charted area. All right... so I'll admit that I was "participating" by calling them up and accepting a squawk code. I was chosing NOT to participate when I requested termination of radar services.... but he did not acknowledge that request. I would have simply gone 1200, but in the back of my mind, I remember reading, "Transponders should be set to 1200, unless ATC tells otherwise." I guess most pilots do what they're told by ATC, and in most cases should do exactly that. I remember once coming back from Florida over Charlotte, SC in a friend's PA-24-250. We'd been slow-baking at 10,500 for about 3 hours without O2, so we were probably both a bit hypoxic. We were going to go right over the top (top is at 10.5)... they "refused," saying we could go to 12500 if we wanted. Unable, so we were vectored 20 miles out of our way. No I know the "correct" way to hand this would be to terminate radar services. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA * * Electrical Engineering * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I remember once coming back from Florida over Charlotte, SC in a friend's
PA-24-250. We'd been slow-baking at 10,500 for about 3 hours without O2, so we were probably both a bit hypoxic. We were going to go right over the top (top is at 10.5)... they "refused," saying we could go to 12500 if we wanted. Unable, so we were vectored 20 miles out of our way. No I know the "correct" way to hand this would be to terminate radar services. You were over the *top* of their airspace, and they vectored you 20 miles out of the way? I'd have told them to pound salt. Politely, of course... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/27/06 13:59, Jay Honeck wrote:
I remember once coming back from Florida over Charlotte, SC in a friend's PA-24-250. We'd been slow-baking at 10,500 for about 3 hours without O2, so we were probably both a bit hypoxic. We were going to go right over the top (top is at 10.5)... they "refused," saying we could go to 12500 if we wanted. Unable, so we were vectored 20 miles out of our way. No I know the "correct" way to hand this would be to terminate radar services. You were over the *top* of their airspace, and they vectored you 20 miles out of the way? The way I read it, they weren't over the top, they were at the top. If they flew over the top, they wouldn't have been at a legal VFR altitude. I'd have told them to pound salt. Politely, of course... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
: You were over the *top* of their airspace, and they vectored you 20
: miles out of the way? : I'd have told them to pound salt. Politely, of course... Yep... at this point in time I wouldn't accept it either. At the time however, I was a green pilot flying a friend's airplane, (with the friend right-seat) so I didn't know any better. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA * * Electrical Engineering * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article om,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: I remember once coming back from Florida over Charlotte, SC in a friend's PA-24-250. We'd been slow-baking at 10,500 for about 3 hours without O2, so we were probably both a bit hypoxic. We were going to go right over the top (top is at 10.5)... they "refused," saying we could go to 12500 if we wanted. Unable, so we were vectored 20 miles out of our way. No I know the "correct" way to hand this would be to terminate radar services. You were over the *top* of their airspace, and they vectored you 20 miles out of the way? I'd have told them to pound salt. Politely, of course... 500 above the top of a Class B is a pretty busy place. All those jets tend to enter and exit the CBAS through the top. Depending on the arrival and departure routes in use at the time, you may find yourself in the middle of a very dense line of heavy metal. Are you within your legal rights to blow off ATC's vector, squawk 1200, and continue on your merry way fat, dumb, and happy? Sure you are. But legal isn't always smart. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... 500 above the top of a Class B is a pretty busy place. All those jets tend to enter and exit the CBAS through the top. Depending on the arrival and departure routes in use at the time, you may find yourself in the middle of a very dense line of heavy metal. Are you within your legal rights to blow off ATC's vector, squawk 1200, and continue on your merry way fat, dumb, and happy? Sure you are. But legal isn't always smart. Is the controller acting within his legal authority when he initiates vectoring of a VFR aircraft 500' above the top of a Class B? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... I remember once coming back from Florida over Charlotte, SC in a friend's PA-24-250. We'd been slow-baking at 10,500 for about 3 hours without O2, so we were probably both a bit hypoxic. We were going to go right over the top (top is at 10.5)... they "refused," saying we could go to 12500 if we wanted. Unable, so we were vectored 20 miles out of our way. No I know the "correct" way to hand this would be to terminate radar services. The top of Charlotte approach control airspace is 10,500 MSL? That's odd, these things tend to be at IFR altitudes. In that situation 11,000 over Charlotte approach airspace would be virtually unusable. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
: 12500 if we wanted. Unable, so we were vectored 20 miles out of our way.
: No I know the "correct" way to hand this would be to terminate radar : services. : : The top of Charlotte approach control airspace is 10,500 MSL? That's odd, : these things tend to be at IFR altitudes. In that situation 11,000 over : Charlotte approach airspace would be virtually unusable. The top was 10,000. We were at 10,500 (almost due north, so VOR-VOR was sometimes even, sometimes odd...at that point it was slightly west). At even 10,001 feet, we wouldn't have had to call them at all, but since we did we got a 20 mile detour as a result. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA * * Electrical Engineering * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The top was 10,000. We were at 10,500 (almost due north, so VOR-VOR was sometimes even, sometimes odd...at
that point it was slightly west). At even 10,001 feet, we wouldn't have had to call them at all, but since we did we got a 20 mile detour as a result. That's just absurd. You must've found a controller that was ****ed about not being allowed to wear flip-flops to work... ducking! ;-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: That's just absurd. You must've found a controller that was ****ed about not being allowed to wear flip-flops to work... hey - the guy was professionally dressed, so he must have been acting professionally, right? also ducking -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |