![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
:
: When I looked all I found was "obey ATC instructions". That's sort of : ambiguous when you are in a situation where you're not required to talk : to ATC at all, but happen to be... : : Doesn't anyone read the AIM anymore? : http://www.faa.gov/atpubs/AIM/Chap3/aim0302.html#3-2-4 Since I didn't (nor had no intention to) enter the Charlie, all I see that is relevant is: d. Air Traffic Services. When two-way radio communications and radar contact are established, all participating VFR aircraft a 1. Sequenced to the primary airport. 2. Provided Class C services within the Class C airspace and the outer area. 3. Provided basic radar services beyond the outer area on a workload permitting basis. This can be terminated by the controller if workload dictates. Once I stated, "I would like to terminate radar services," part d.2. is no longer relevant since I am no longer participating. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA * * Electrical Engineering * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... Since I didn't (nor had no intention to) enter the Charlie, all I see that is relevant is: d. Air Traffic Services. When two-way radio communications and radar contact are established, all participating VFR aircraft a 1. Sequenced to the primary airport. 2. Provided Class C services within the Class C airspace and the outer area. 3. Provided basic radar services beyond the outer area on a workload permitting basis. This can be terminated by the controller if workload dictates. Once I stated, "I would like to terminate radar services," part d.2. is no longer relevant since I am no longer participating. Exactly. Reading the relevant parts of the AIM would preclude wondering what the rules are when given altitude restrictions while talking to approach control above the Class C airspace. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
: Once I stated, "I would like to terminate radar services," part
: d.2. is no longer relevant since I am no longer : participating. : : Exactly. Reading the relevant parts of the AIM would preclude wondering : what the rules are when given altitude restrictions while talking to : approach control above the Class C airspace. My own issue was in the termination part. When I told them I wanted to terminate radar services, the request was ignored. When I inquired again whether he'd heard my request, he "denied" it by saying he was going to "keep me with him until west of the airport." That's why I was trying to find some sort of rules defining this situation. I guess as the pilot outside the Charlie, I should have simply said, "Terminating radar services, squaking 1200, will remain clear the Charlie." I didn't quite think of that at the time however. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA * * Electrical Engineering * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... My own issue was in the termination part. When I told them I wanted to terminate radar services, the request was ignored. When I inquired again whether he'd heard my request, he "denied" it by saying he was going to "keep me with him until west of the airport." That's why I was trying to find some sort of rules defining this situation. I guess as the pilot outside the Charlie, I should have simply said, "Terminating radar services, squaking 1200, will remain clear the Charlie." I didn't quite think of that at the time however. Bingo. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "zatatime" wrote in message ... First, let me say this is a great thread. What I'm stuck on is the fact that you were already a participating aircraft. Once participating ATC instructions need to be adhered to (outlined in previous posts). What I can't get past is, once participating can we just stop participating, or was our choice to participate initially some sort of agreement to abide by the rules of ATC as a participating aircraft until outside their area, or mutual agreement to terminate services. As you initially stated, it would be great to find something we can read about this that would clarify. Of course you can choose to stop participating. Why would you think anything else? It would be no different than canceling IFR when the system became more trouble than it was worth and continuing flight under VFR. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |