![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What part of "may not" or "cannot" in the above rule permits VFR over the
top WITHOUT ground reference? The fact that you can SEE the ground (have ground reference) through a broken layer if it's "not that broken", even though you can't legally descend through it VFR. The original poster gave me the impression it was a solid cloud deck below him. In that case he not only would not be over the top, but he would also not have ground reference. Two different things at the same time. Bottom line would be VFR over a solid overcast would be a no no for a student. VFR over the top over a broken overcast would be legal as long as the student has the ability to identify surface features. Yep. My point exactly. the student pilot is following the letter to the law as he does have ground references. Smart no..... Wise no..... Ayup. "What's legal isn't always safe, and what's safe isn't always legal." Jose -- "Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry Potter). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
First Solo | W P Dixon | Piloting | 8 | August 16th 06 05:07 AM |
1.4 solo.. | Beav | Rotorcraft | 0 | November 5th 04 12:27 AM |
Cross Country the main focus of soaring? | mat Redsell | Soaring | 77 | October 18th 04 10:40 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |