"Guilty" of Flying the Wrong Pattern?

Larry Dighera wrote in
:

On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 10:49:20 GMT, Marty Shapiro
wrote in
:

an aircraft owned
and operated by the government of a State, the District of Columbia,
or a territory or possession of the United States or a political
subdivision of one of these governments;


What would constitute a 'political subdivision' of a state? Would a
county, city, or town qualify, or does this official definition refer
to a state militia (eg California Highway Patrol)?



Federal agency, state, state department, county (parish in LA), city,
township, town, village. All are political subdivision's.

--
Marty Shapiro
Silicon Rallye Inc.

(remove SPAMNOT to email me)

Marty Shapiro writes:

Federal agency, state, state department, county (parish in LA), city,
township, town, village. All are political subdivision's.

Cities and the like are corporations.

If any political subdivision on a map counts, then school teachers,
firefighters, garbage collectors, and a vast number of other people
can fly without certificates and ignore the FARs.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Cities and the like are corporations.

Do you have the slightest clue what a municipal corporation is
and why state law provides for it? Incessant, arrogant, ignorant
jibberish.

F--

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Marty Shapiro writes:

Federal agency, state, state department, county (parish in LA), city,
township, town, village. All are political subdivision's.

Cities and the like are corporations.

If any political subdivision on a map counts, then school teachers,
firefighters, garbage collectors, and a vast number of other people
can fly without certificates and ignore the FARs.


If they are flying public aircraft they can. As I mentioned in a earlier
post many cities and counties have gotten surplus UH-58s (the military
version of the Bell 206 helicopter) these aircraft are not certified and
they don't have N numbers.