![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Skunk" wrote in message
... 1. The ILS would be off in the cockpit Yes, and this is the PF's (Pilot Flying) problem. Only if the controller is giving the pilot a SAR "talkdown" (very rare) would he be using any system that allows him to see accurately where the aircraft is relative to the runway centreline. 2. If the ATCT can't see an aircraft landing incorrectly on the taxiway what good are they? Remember the Tower is generally off to the side of the runway - often by quite a way. Thus, until an aircraft is relatively close to the runway, it's pretty hard to picture where an aircraft is relative to the centreline. 3. The pilot(s) should notice Yes, they should. Landing in the right place, in the right configuration, and at the right speed is the job of the pilots. 4. The pilots on the ground should notice They _might_ notice, but the priority of the pilots of any aircraft on the ground is to make their way around the airport safely, down the right routes and without banging into anything or anybody. Taxying, though apparently easy, is actually one of the places where plenty of accidents occur through complacency. And let's face it, if aircraft on the ground were having accidents because their crew were too busy looking into the sky, you'd be moaning about that too. It may well be that someone waiting on a taxiway might have been gazing into the air and thought: "Hang about, his approach looks a bit weird", but (a) at an airfield with multiple runways the instinct might be that the landing aircraft is heading into a different runway. And even if you do choose to say anything, it might take a while to get a word in edgeways if the frequency is busy. In todays America nobody is at fault huh? Errr, no. If a pilot is told which bit of ground to land on, and then lands on the wrong bit, then it's his (or her) fault. Simple as that. Go surf the NTSB incident report archive and you'll find plenty of reports where blame is attributed - to engineers, to controllers, to pilots, to wherever it's due. DC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Runway ID | Lakeview Bill | Piloting | 55 | October 18th 05 12:53 AM |
Disappearing Runways | Kyle Boatright | Piloting | 5 | May 26th 05 03:19 AM |
Winds on long runways | Casey Wilson | Piloting | 15 | July 17th 04 08:35 AM |
Extreme Runways | JohnMcGrew | Piloting | 9 | October 25th 03 02:57 PM |
fs2002 - increase intensity taxiway and runways' lights? | Mark Cherry | Simulators | 0 | September 23rd 03 01:08 AM |