![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Laurence Doering writes:
No, the plotter he's talking about is a combined protractor and ruler made of transparent plastic. The ruler's scales are calibrated to match distances on aeronautical charts. You can see what they look like at: http://www.sportys.com/acb/webpage.cfm?&DID=19&WebPage_ID=68 I see now. Thanks. Still looks a bit inconvenient for use in flight, although it would be easy enough to use for planning on a desk or table. Not very expensive, either, compared to most of the other stuff on the site ($995 for a pair of headphones that costs only $20 to make??). Definitely a rich man's hobby. It's possible to whip out a plotter and measure distances and headings on a folded-up sectional chart in your lap in a typical light aircraft cockpit, but it's not very convenient. And the aircraft is still flying. I know aircraft can be configured to fly straight and level for long distances, especially with an autopilot, but still ... it seems that one could get into trouble quickly while peering at the chart. Typically you'd use a plotter for flight planning on the ground. Use the ruler to draw a line on the chart along your intended course, use the protractor to measure the angle between your course and a north-south line on the chart, and use the scale on the ruler to find distances. That sounds easy enough. To answer your original question, in the pre-GPS era most people would plot course legs that would keep them well clear of restricted airspace. Make sure you stay near your planned course using a combination of pilotage and dead reckoning, and you don't have to worry about exactly where the boundary of the restricted airspace is. I'm glad that my original question is being answered, thanks. Seriously, if you want to learn this stuff, you might want to buy a private pilot ground school textbook of some sort, a plotter, and a sectional chart or two. Use the textbook to find out how to plan a flight using a plotter and charts, and then fly it in your simulator. I'm not sure what books to buy, and I can't buy anything off the Net because I don't have a working credit card. There are a couple of good pilot shops here, but their choice of English-language books is limited (and very expensive, as always), with most stuff being in French. Similarly, the only charts I can find locally are French charts, and my simulator flights are mostly in the western United States. I can find the charts online now, but obviously it's hard to use this plotter device with an LCD screen. Nevertheless, I'm trying to use the online charts more for flight planning, particularly for flights with VATSIM, where others might notice my mistakes. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mxsmanic wrote: [...] Definitely a rich man's hobby. Yes and no. Certainly there are ways to spend a lot of money on flying, but that goes for boating as well. People are always surprised to hear that a good used airplane is about the same price as a fully loaded van or SUV. I think everyone should be A) drafted in the military for two years, and B) taught to boat, drive and fly. Then we might get a better and more informed voting public. YMMV ;-) Kev |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kev writes:
Yes and no. Certainly there are ways to spend a lot of money on flying, but that goes for boating as well. Boating is a rich man's hobby, too! People are always surprised to hear that a good used airplane is about the same price as a fully loaded van or SUV. But that's only the tip of the iceberg. What about fuel, and insurance, and maintenance, and charts and databases, not to mention the cost up front of just getting a license and keeping current with medical exams and what-not? I think everyone should be A) drafted in the military for two years, and B) taught to boat, drive and fly. Then we might get a better and more informed voting public. Many of the most uninformed people would never be able to learn to fly or even to boat; a lot of them have difficulty with driving. And they would be useless in the military for anything other than cannon fodder. However, many of these people don't vote to begin with. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
chart heads-up | Jose | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | September 29th 06 07:25 PM |
Sectional Chart Question | Teranews | Piloting | 27 | June 23rd 05 12:14 AM |
WAC Chart Images on line? | Rich | Owning | 5 | March 22nd 04 11:17 PM |