A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Good Used 4 Seaters



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 3rd 06, 05:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Ross Richardson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 91
Default Good Used 4 Seaters

Ray Andraka wrote:
Ross Richardson wrote:



Why do you say a C-172 is less stable. I have a '65 model and find it
quite stable. And, I am familiar with Cherokees as I got my commerical
using the -140, -160, & -180s.



The Cherokees have a higher wing loading, which makes them more "stable"
in turbulence. On the other-hand, that also makes them feel a bit more
"truck-like". The Cherokees are more comfortable in turbulence.


OK, I agee with that.

--

Regards, Ross
C-172F 180HP
KSWI
  #2  
Old November 3rd 06, 07:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,573
Default Good Used 4 Seaters

The Cherokees have a higher wing loading, which makes them more "stable"
in turbulence. On the other-hand, that also makes them feel a bit more
"truck-like". The Cherokees are more comfortable in turbulence.


OK, I agee with that.


And if you REALLY want stability, fly a 235 in turbulence with 84
gallons of fuel in those short wings. We have flown with Warriors and
172s in "light to moderate chop" (per their reports) that we have
never, ever felt.

Wing loading sure helps in the bumps.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #3  
Old November 3rd 06, 10:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Ray Andraka
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 267
Default Good Used 4 Seaters

Jay Honeck wrote:

The Cherokees have a higher wing loading, which makes them more "stable"
in turbulence. On the other-hand, that also makes them feel a bit more
"truck-like". The Cherokees are more comfortable in turbulence.


OK, I agee with that.



And if you REALLY want stability, fly a 235 in turbulence with 84
gallons of fuel in those short wings. We have flown with Warriors and
172s in "light to moderate chop" (per their reports) that we have
never, ever felt.

Wing loading sure helps in the bumps.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


Yup, same with the straight wing Cherokee Six. I've been up numerous
times where I hear lots of complaints about the ride while I am flying
along comfortably hardly feeling any bumps. I've remarked a couple
times when getting tossed around in heavier turbulence that I wouldn't
want to be in a 172 then.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good-bye, My Good Friend Capt.Doug Home Built 2 August 12th 05 02:47 AM
Any good aviation clip-art? zingzang Piloting 2 August 11th 05 01:32 AM
We lost a good one.... [email protected] Piloting 10 May 28th 05 05:21 AM
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good Excelsior Home Built 0 April 22nd 05 01:11 AM
Commander gives Navy airframe plan good review Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 July 8th 03 09:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.