A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ASG-29 versus Ventus 2CX



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 4th 06, 03:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Marc Ramsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 207
Default ASG-29 versus Ventus 2CX

wrote:
Why would a buyer who is putting up 120K plus be biased? We put up the
money and there is no return to being brand loyal. The buyer should
control. I have owned gliders from AS and SH, no bias only want the
best my dollars can buy.


Because the "best" is highly subjective, and will change over time and
with future contest results. What is the intent? To win a regional,
national, or world contest, this season, or 5 years down the line?
Mostly 15M or 18M? East coast, west coast, somewhere in between, or
somewhere else entirely? How many hours total and per season? How many
of those hours are in contests? Fly all the time loaded to the gills
with water, or only occasionally? Who do you fly with, and what do they
fly? Cockpit safety important to you? How long are you willing to wait
for delivery? How much are you willing to spend, and how much more will
you spend to get things set up the way you want? Etc.

Right now, bias is pretty much all you have to work with. The ASG-29 is
the latest design from a respected manufacturer, which is based on a
previous design that worked well enough for lots of people to win
contests in them. It can carry more water than the last generation of
gliders, so it will likely outrun most everything on those 10 knot days.
If money, delivery time, pilot size, and the possibility of having to
pay to reprofile bumpy wings are not issues to you, then it would be
silly to order anything else at this moment. If I were in that
position, I'd have put in my order in the day it was announced...

  #2  
Old November 4th 06, 05:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jim Hultman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default ASG-29 versus Ventus 2CX

Hey Marc,
Finally you've posted an intelligent reply to her original question, instead
of running her down for having more $$ than you.
Good Job!
Jim
"Marc Ramsey" wrote in message
.. .
wrote:
Why would a buyer who is putting up 120K plus be biased? We put up the
money and there is no return to being brand loyal. The buyer should
control. I have owned gliders from AS and SH, no bias only want the
best my dollars can buy.


Because the "best" is highly subjective, and will change over time and
with future contest results. What is the intent? To win a regional,
national, or world contest, this season, or 5 years down the line?
Mostly 15M or 18M? East coast, west coast, somewhere in between, or
somewhere else entirely? How many hours total and per season? How many
of those hours are in contests? Fly all the time loaded to the gills
with water, or only occasionally? Who do you fly with, and what do they
fly? Cockpit safety important to you? How long are you willing to wait
for delivery? How much are you willing to spend, and how much more will
you spend to get things set up the way you want? Etc.

Right now, bias is pretty much all you have to work with. The ASG-29 is
the latest design from a respected manufacturer, which is based on a
previous design that worked well enough for lots of people to win
contests in them. It can carry more water than the last generation of
gliders, so it will likely outrun most everything on those 10 knot days.
If money, delivery time, pilot size, and the possibility of having to
pay to reprofile bumpy wings are not issues to you, then it would be
silly to order anything else at this moment. If I were in that
position, I'd have put in my order in the day it was announced...



  #3  
Old November 4th 06, 05:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Marc Ramsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 207
Default ASG-29 versus Ventus 2CX

Jim Hultman wrote:
Hey Marc,
Finally you've posted an intelligent reply to her original question, instead
of running her down for having more $$ than you.


Who was running her down? I buy the prettiest glider I can fit into,
with the bucks that I have, just like almost everyone else. If she
hasn't figured that out yet, endlessly posting the same questions isn't
going to get her an answer...

Marc
  #4  
Old November 4th 06, 05:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Marc Ramsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 207
Default ASG-29 versus Ventus 2CX

Jim Hultman wrote:
Hey Marc,
Finally you've posted an intelligent reply to her original question, instead
of running her down for having more $$ than you.


Who was running her down? I buy the prettiest glider I can fit into,
with the bucks that I have, just like almost everyone else. If she
hasn't figured that out yet, endlessly posting the same questions isn't
going to get her an answer...

Marc
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods: Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue Mike Naval Aviation 26 July 11th 06 11:38 PM
Ventus C 17.6 John Shelton Soaring 0 January 17th 05 05:48 PM
ventus C 17.5 versus ls6-18 Stuart Kinnear Soaring 12 November 25th 04 07:34 AM
TURBULATOR TAPE ON VENTUS B Ventus B Soaring 5 February 18th 04 08:27 PM
Ventus & Ventus 2 John W Soaring 3 December 7th 03 03:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.