![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judah writes:
Yes, but you also seem to be extraordinarily concerned with the possibility of flying through a non-restrictive area. Sometimes MOAs are active, and there may be dangerous activities going on inside. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judah writes:
It should be pointed out that in order to behold that certificate, you had to have a certain number of hours of training with a certified instructor, and then had to demonstrate your ability to perform certain manuevers within certain standard levels of tolerance. But you don't have to be able to fly a plane safely, as so many accidents prove. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder writes:
(2) Except as provided in Sec. 61.110 of this part, 3 hours of night flight training in a single-engine airplane that includes-- (i) One cross-country flight of over 100 nautical miles total distance; and Sounds like just crossing Phoenix would qualify. (i) 5 hours of solo cross-country time; (ii) One solo cross-country flight of at least 150 nautical miles total distance, with full-stop landings at a minimum of three points, and one segment of the flight consisting of a straight-line distance of at least 50 nautical miles between the takeoff and landing locations; and Sounds like crossing Phoenix might _still_ qualify. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... Judah writes: It should be pointed out that in order to behold that certificate, you had to have a certain number of hours of training with a certified instructor, and then had to demonstrate your ability to perform certain manuevers within certain standard levels of tolerance. But you don't have to be able to fly a plane safely, as so many accidents prove. Name a test of a skill, that involves potential great danger, that is infallible. Idiot. m |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Mxsmanic posted:
Neil Gould writes: How on Earth would you have the slightest idea as to whether it is or isn't???? Because, as I have previously explained, I study. While neonates may be constrained to learn only through direct experience and trial and error, older human beings have the option of looking things up. The error that you repeatedly make is thinking that reading alone will give you insights into a physical experience. It won't. All pilots study, and are well-read on the topic of flight; if they weren't, they wouldn't even get so far as to be student pilots. In addition to the reading, we have practice; many hours of translating the theory of flight into the physical reality of flight under the guidance of those who have flown and can correct our misunderstanding. It isn't until we have demonstrated proficiency as well as a level of knowledge that we are granted a certificate. Regardless of your high opinion of yourself, you are not going to even come close to flying with MSFS. To make matters worse, you don't even read the references that you're given that answer your primitive questions, preferring to be spoon-fed in a newsgroup, but you lack the level of knowledge necessary to understand the answers that are given. So, to put things into your frame of reference, if we are neonates, you haven't even managed your first cell division. Neil |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Because, as I have previously explained, I study. While neonates may be constrained to learn only through direct experience and trial and error, older human beings have the option of looking things up. If you study and look things up, why do you keep asking questions on this newsgroup that have already been answered elsewhere? The implication is that you do NOT study or look things up, you simply wait for people to relay information to you at your convenience. |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.piloting B A R R Y wrote:
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 04:23:59 GMT, A Lieberma wrote: B A R R Y wrote in news:ziN2h.754$7F3.71 : I'm happy, but we just got the Slowdowner as "perfect" as I care... G Took me three years to get to the point where I got every switch knob and button working. We kind of gave up on the parking brake. G That's one of those things that you think is just an extravagance. Until you pull up to a foreign airport, taxi up to the fuel tank, shut down the engine, and then realize that there is a slight slope to the ramp and if you let go the brakes, you will roll into the tank. "Ummm... hello... Podunk Unicom?... Anybody home?..." Next up will be the interior when I get rich and famous for the money. I feel your pain... -- Don Poitras |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: My coordinates, my heading and speed, and an arrow pointing to my destination heading if I've entered one into the GPS. How do you have time to look without hitting a mountain? |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: But you don't have to be able to fly a plane safely, as so many accidents prove. You have to be able to demonstrate that you can fly a plane safely before getting your certificate. That is the stated detailed mission of the Practical Test Standards. The accidents only prove that human beings don't always do what they can. Perhaps they encounter situations that are beyond their control and/or capability, perhaps they make mistakes, or perhaps they are arrogant cowboys and decide they can do what they want. The same could be said about automobile accidents. The holder of a driver's license has demonstrated that the s/he can drive safely and is aware of the basic rules. And yet, the idea that those rules can be broken is so institutionalized, the government has produced a "point" system that allows drivers to be CAUGHT as many as 12 times before their privileges are taken away. The system is so institutionalized that some believe certain speed zones have been installed not for safety, but for revenue production. The same cannot be said of airspace safety. |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judah writes:
If you study and look things up, why do you keep asking questions on this newsgroup that have already been answered elsewhere? I like to have multiple sources of information. It's risky to trust a single source. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
chart heads-up | Jose | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | September 29th 06 07:25 PM |
Sectional Chart Question | Teranews | Piloting | 27 | June 23rd 05 12:14 AM |
WAC Chart Images on line? | Rich | Owning | 5 | March 22nd 04 11:17 PM |