![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"gpsman" wrote in message
oups.com... Kyle Boatright wrote: When you have 5 hours you haven't yet had the opportunity to have learned the subtle points, nor develop much "touch" to lose. The less you know and the less experience you have the less skills seem to be necessary and the easier everything seems to be... since you haven't yet broken the surface of knowledge or skill. Point taken, but not entirely agreed with. The fact remains that a pilot who is at the circuits part of the training, regardless of how many hours he's taken to get there, has sufficient "touch" to be able to control the aircraft with minimal to no input from an instructor. True, the instructor must be with the student at all times, but the idea is for the student to actually 'fly' the aircraft, with the instructor leaving the controls alone unless necessary to avoid an incident. The fact I'm not solo yet doesn't mean I can't fly. I can fly, well enough for circuits at least, just perhaps not well enough to get myself out of trouble should anything untoward happen, hence the requirement for the instructor to be with me. Surely if a student can get an aircraft off the ground, around a full circuit, and back on the ground again in one piece, without the instructor touching the controls, he has enough "touch" to lose! Oz/Crash Lander |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Crash Lander" wrote in message ... "gpsman" wrote in message oups.com... Kyle Boatright wrote: When you have 5 hours you haven't yet had the opportunity to have learned the subtle points, nor develop much "touch" to lose. The less you know and the less experience you have the less skills seem to be necessary and the easier everything seems to be... since you haven't yet broken the surface of knowledge or skill. Point taken, but not entirely agreed with. The fact remains that a pilot who is at the circuits part of the training, regardless of how many hours he's taken to get there, has sufficient "touch" to be able to control the aircraft with minimal to no input from an instructor. True, the instructor must be with the student at all times, but the idea is for the student to actually 'fly' the aircraft, with the instructor leaving the controls alone unless necessary to avoid an incident. The fact I'm not solo yet doesn't mean I can't fly. I can fly, well enough for circuits at least, just perhaps not well enough to get myself out of trouble should anything untoward happen, hence the requirement for the instructor to be with me. Surely if a student can get an aircraft off the ground, around a full circuit, and back on the ground again in one piece, without the instructor touching the controls, he has enough "touch" to lose! Oz/Crash Lander You are absolutely right about this CL. A good instructor will only fly the airplane long enough to demonstrate something to the student then give the airplane right back to the student. For all intent and purposes, the student should be the one actually on the controls from startup to shutdown. By the time you get into the pattern you should have a good foundation of the basics and all the pattern should be is an extension of those basics flown to tighter and closer tolerances. A good instructor knows exactly how far to let the student fly into an error. The exceptional instructor starts talking the student into correcting any error on their own, without physical intervention by the instructor. There are of course times when an instructor has to correct physically, but this should be viewed as the exception; not the rule! Dudley Henriques |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crash Lander wrote: brevity snip
"gpsman" wrote in message oups.com... Kyle Boatright wrote: When you have 5 hours you haven't yet had the opportunity to have learned the subtle points, nor develop much "touch" to lose. The less you know and the less experience you have the less skills seem to be necessary and the easier everything seems to be... since you haven't yet broken the surface of knowledge or skill. Point taken, but not entirely agreed with. The fact remains that a pilot who is at the circuits part of the training, regardless of how many hours he's taken to get there, has sufficient "touch" to be able to control the aircraft with minimal to no input from an instructor. Sure, no argument there. But the fact remains that the masters of every fine skill feel the edge come off their technique after 24-48 hours. They notice that, the novice doesn't, since he hasn't yet attained that edge. That's why Yo-Yo Ma and his ilk still practice between gigs and can coax better performance from inferior instruments. You may not need his level of skill to fly, but you'd probably be best off working toward it. To me, flying is all about practicing precision and attention to detail. If you can meet a master aerial agricultural sprayer ask him to show you a GPS record of his spray patterns. ----- - gpsman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Naval Air Refueling Needs Deferred in Air Force Tanker Plan | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 47 | May 22nd 04 03:36 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |