![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
EridanMan writes:
That is, lets say I trim for 110 knots at 4000 feet, 75% power, and fly hands off for a bit. now - if I pull back on the yoke, i'll trade some of my airspeed for climb ("zoom climb")... the further I get off my "target" speed, the greater the yoke is going to push against my hands... now - the "weird" thing (not really when you think about the physics, but certainly not intuitive to sim-drivers) is that if I then decide to release the yoke, the aircraft will _completely automatically_ return to its trimmed airspeed, and pretty close to its original altitude. The sim behaves the same way, but without any control forces as feedback. However, it is indeed counter-intuitive at first. It dawned on me quickly enough why this is so, but initially one tends to think that an aircraft will go straight into the ground once it is pointed down, or infinitely high once it is pointed up. (Thinking a bit about the laws of physics rapidly shows that this cannot be the case, but the influence of popular notions is strong.) That is why flying with the trim is generally a bad idea - fly with the yoke, trim off the preassure = flying precisely. It's the latter part that's hard to simulate. What I sometimes do is set the autopilot for my altitude, let it set the trim (which it does with much greater precision than I have available to me), and then shut it back off, with the aircraft trimmed for my current altitude. If I'm on A/P for a long time and I wish to fly with it off, I adjust power until the A/P has trim set to zero, then I shut off the autopilot. This gives me a stable aircraft with neutral trim, which insures that I have full control authority in both directions. (If I were to shut off the A/P while it has heavy trim in place, I might not have the authority I need later, unless I carefully retrim myself, which is awkward for reasons I have already stated.) There is a "takeoff point" for the trim system, generally set to provide good yoke feel for Vy climbout. I see that on several aircraft in the sim. I don't use take-off trim because I don't want to be misled into thinking that I have more climb ability than I actually have. By leaving trim neutral I can tell how much I have to persuade the aircraft to climb, and so I have less chance of an unpleasant surprise if I need more elevator authority. Once you are airborne, simply use the yoke to SET the aircraft off of its currently trimmed configuration, and then use the trim controls to adjust the trim configuration to the current configuration- that is really most of flying. I try to do this. It's awkward with no feedback, but it's still possible from watching the instruments. And the better I know a given aircraft, the better I can estimate how much to change things to get it trimmed quickly. Still, I don't think I trim nearly as much as many real-world pilots. Unless I plan to be in the same attitude for quite some time, I leave the trim alone. I especially worry about it being a distraction during critical phases of flight--spinning the trim wheel while I should be looking at instruments or talking to ATC seems risky. And from what I understand, the only advantage of trim is that it eliminates excess control pressures ... but I can tolerate those for the brief period of take-off and landing. There was some discussion on A.net about this - Boeing goes to great lengths in their FBW systems to keep the 'feel' of traditional hydrolics, trim and everything. Airbus, on the other hand, just has the aircraft automatically and always trim for 1-G flight. Another reason to prefer Boeing. Boeing designs for pilots; Airbus designs for computer gamers. I.E, the airbus actually flies more like your flight simulator than my Piper ![]() See above (I wrote the above before reading this). I haven't read that either way - but I think you over-estimate the necessity of knowing where your control's "really" are. Maybe. I guess it's from association with other types of vehicles. One doesn't set a car to veer consistently to the right, for example, but cars don't move in three dimensions. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Return from AirVenture | john smith | Piloting | 7 | August 3rd 06 05:35 PM |
Fly-By-Wire Flight Controls | Charles Talleyrand | Piloting | 52 | December 28th 05 10:27 PM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
for mr. pethukov ( Bush May Announce Return To Moon At Kitty Hawk) | captain! | Military Aviation | 6 | October 30th 03 05:11 PM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |