![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Daniels wrote:
Interesting discussion about "fast" gliders. I imagine there's a bunch of jet jockys rolling on the floor laughing. How about 180 knots over the fantail trying for the third wire on an 700 foot 'runway'. The fastest landing glider in common use is the (very) old 2-32. The 2-32 POH provides little guidance on approach speeds but if the airspeed indicator had one of those little yellow triangles showing minimum approach speed, it would be around 75MPH. Most pilots respect the 2-32 enough to fly the pattern around 80 - 90 MPH. I haven't got the guts to let the approach speed get below 80. No glass glider I know of lands that fast. Wow, those numbers strike me as fast. I did my primary training in 2-32s and typically flew the pattern around 70mph and had sufficient float on landing. I can't imagine why anyone would regularly do a 90mph pattern. I did do 100mph on final once, but that was part of a checkout before I could do commercial rides in the 2-32. Those velocity limiting dive brakes are pretty impressive. :-) Jeremy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeremy Zawodny" wrote in message ... Bill Daniels wrote: Interesting discussion about "fast" gliders. I imagine there's a bunch of jet jockys rolling on the floor laughing. How about 180 knots over the fantail trying for the third wire on an 700 foot 'runway'. The fastest landing glider in common use is the (very) old 2-32. The 2-32 POH provides little guidance on approach speeds but if the airspeed indicator had one of those little yellow triangles showing minimum approach speed, it would be around 75MPH. Most pilots respect the 2-32 enough to fly the pattern around 80 - 90 MPH. I haven't got the guts to let the approach speed get below 80. No glass glider I know of lands that fast. Wow, those numbers strike me as fast. I did my primary training in 2-32s and typically flew the pattern around 70mph and had sufficient float on landing. I can't imagine why anyone would regularly do a 90mph pattern. I did do 100mph on final once, but that was part of a checkout before I could do commercial rides in the 2-32. Those velocity limiting dive brakes are pretty impressive. :-) Jeremy The concern isn't about float, it's about the 2-32's behavior in a gust induced stall. Bill Daniels |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
90mph patterns in a 2-32 aren't uncommon. Especially at sites that
have had one spin in. Frank Whiteley Jeremy Zawodny wrote: Bill Daniels wrote: Interesting discussion about "fast" gliders. I imagine there's a bunch of jet jockys rolling on the floor laughing. How about 180 knots over the fantail trying for the third wire on an 700 foot 'runway'. The fastest landing glider in common use is the (very) old 2-32. The 2-32 POH provides little guidance on approach speeds but if the airspeed indicator had one of those little yellow triangles showing minimum approach speed, it would be around 75MPH. Most pilots respect the 2-32 enough to fly the pattern around 80 - 90 MPH. I haven't got the guts to let the approach speed get below 80. No glass glider I know of lands that fast. Wow, those numbers strike me as fast. I did my primary training in 2-32s and typically flew the pattern around 70mph and had sufficient float on landing. I can't imagine why anyone would regularly do a 90mph pattern. I did do 100mph on final once, but that was part of a checkout before I could do commercial rides in the 2-32. Those velocity limiting dive brakes are pretty impressive. :-) Jeremy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bill Daniels wrote: Interesting discussion about "fast" gliders. I imagine there's a bunch of jet jockys rolling on the floor laughing. How about 180 knots over the fantail trying for the third wire on an 700 foot 'runway'. Bill, why would anyone be laughing?Landing a jet and landing a sailplane (Especially on a unprepared surface) are two totaly different things.Sounds like one of those "There I was" stories. The fastest landing glider in common use is the (very) old 2-32. The 2-32 POH provides little guidance on approach speeds but if the airspeed indicator had one of those little yellow triangles showing minimum approach speed, it would be around 75MPH. Most pilots respect the 2-32 enough to fly the pattern around 80 - 90 MPH. I haven't got the guts to let the approach speed get below 80. No glass glider I know of lands that fast. Here you are getting even further from E.G's post.With less than 40 of these things still flying, the 2-32 is not that common at all.There was a thead earlier on RAS about a guy who advocated pattern speeds near VNE in a 2-33 without taking into account the hazards such a high speed creates.I would say your post follows the same logic.If you touch down at 80KTS you are probably creating more hazards than you are avoiding.Were you posted "No glass glider I know of lands that fast" should read no glass glider PILOT I know of lands that fast.Think about what you are post here Bob.If you fly a pattern at 40 MPH or so above stall speed to avoid a "Gust induced stall" this means you are expecting a gust in exess of 40MPH.I have never flown on a day when the wind was gusting that high above the steady state wind..What is it like? Sounds like another "there I was" story. In fact, I'd say that it's more likely that a less-skilled pilot would get in trouble flying a too-fast approach in a slick glass ship. Anyone would get in trouble flying too fast an aproach.What the ship is made of has no bearing on this. Bill Daniels K Urban P.S. How did you keep your wheel brake from catching on fire? "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message news ![]() wrote: Glass gliders are "hot" only if you have only flown old high drag non glass gliders. Stop training in those. I have 5000 hours in glass gliders, and I still think they're "hot". I loved landing my Ka-6e or our club's Blanik, because they had great speed control (speed limiting brakes) and seemed to land at a walking pace. What a comfort during an off-field landing. Next best was my ASW 20 with 40 degree landing flaps - landed faster, of course, but nothing like my Std Cirrus or the motorglider I fly now. I know there are people that don't go cross country because their glass ship lands fast, and this disturbs them enough they don't have the confidence to risk an off-airport landing. I haven't kept track of what these people learned in, so I can't say starting in a faster glider would have made the difference. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly "Transponders in Sailplanes" on the Soaring Safety Foundation website www.soaringsafety.org/prevention/articles.html "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bagmaker wrote:
..../... To insist that newcomers start in an old tin or wooden warhorse may well kill any interest and passion for flying in the first place! Well said. I'm a case in point. My background is over 30 years flying competitive Free Flight model gliders. Back in the late 80s or early 90s I was at a couple of trial flight evenings with ASK-13s as the aircraft. I enjoyed the evenings, but never had the urge to learn to fly. In 1999 during an aviation related holiday I took a trial flight in an ASK-21 and was instantly hooked. I spent the winter researching local clubs and joined up in spring 2000. My club's fleet is all glass and I've never looked back, learning in ASK-21, G103 and Puchacz, then working up the club fleet through Juniors to Pegase and Discus. Currently I own a lightly Streifenedered Standard Libelle and love it to bits. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Still more Airbus woes (1) | john smith | Piloting | 11 | June 17th 06 09:42 PM |
Still more Airbus woes (3) | john smith | Piloting | 0 | June 14th 06 03:37 PM |
Still more Airbus woes (2) | john smith | Piloting | 0 | June 14th 06 03:35 PM |
Australia chooses Airbus tankers | John Cook | Military Aviation | 0 | April 16th 04 10:25 AM |
Airbus Aiming at U.S. Military Market | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 21st 03 08:55 PM |