Thrown out of an FBO...

"Ron Lee" wrote in message
...
Marriage is between a man and woman. get over it and tell your homo
friends to get back in the closet. I am tired of their "in your face"
tactics.

Getting married is an "in your face" tactic to the same extent that sitting
in the front of a public bus was an "in your face" tactic. And as your post
nicely illustrates, it elicits slurs and hostility from the same sort of
person.

Gary,

Getting married is an "in your face" tactic to the same extent that sitting
in the front of a public bus was an "in your face" tactic. And as your post
nicely illustrates, it elicits slurs and hostility from the same sort of
person.


I like your style.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

"Gary Drescher" wrote:

"Ron Lee" wrote in message
...
Marriage is between a man and woman. get over it and tell your homo
friends to get back in the closet. I am tired of their "in your face"
tactics.

Getting married is an "in your face" tactic to the same extent that sitting
in the front of a public bus was an "in your face" tactic. And as your post
nicely illustrates, it elicits slurs and hostility from the same sort of
person.

That analogy does not work for me. Frankly I am just tired of trying
to normalize deviancy. Next thing you will claim is normal is
bestiality and child molestation.

Ron Lee

"Ron Lee" wrote in message
...
"Gary Drescher" wrote:

"Ron Lee" wrote in message
...
Marriage is between a man and woman. get over it and tell your homo
friends to get back in the closet. I am tired of their "in your face"
tactics.

Getting married is an "in your face" tactic to the same extent that
sitting
in the front of a public bus was an "in your face" tactic. And as your
post
nicely illustrates, it elicits slurs and hostility from the same sort of
person.

That analogy does not work for me. Frankly I am just tired of trying
to normalize deviancy.

And I'm tired of bigots crying 'deviancy' whenever others don't "know their
place" as assigned by their race or (in this case) gender.

Yet despite our fatigue, here we both are. Isn't aviation a wonderful
melting pot?

--Gary

Gary Drescher wrote:

"Ron Lee" wrote in message
...
"Gary Drescher" wrote:

"Ron Lee" wrote in message
...
Marriage is between a man and woman. get over it and tell your homo
friends to get back in the closet. I am tired of their "in your face"
tactics.

Getting married is an "in your face" tactic to the same extent that
sitting
in the front of a public bus was an "in your face" tactic. And as your
post
nicely illustrates, it elicits slurs and hostility from the same sort of
person.

That analogy does not work for me. Frankly I am just tired of trying
to normalize deviancy.

And I'm tired of bigots crying 'deviancy' whenever others don't "know their
place" as assigned by their race or (in this case) gender.

Yet despite our fatigue, here we both are. Isn't aviation a wonderful
melting pot?

Some of use so-called bigots have quarrel with 'deviancy' or whatever but are
merely dismayed about a trampling of process and judicial codes. Apparently
procedure is maleable when inconvenient depending on the issue.

"Jessica Taylor" wrote in message
...
Gary Drescher wrote:
"Ron Lee" wrote in message

Frankly I am just tired of trying to normalize deviancy.

And I'm tired of bigots crying 'deviancy' whenever others don't "know
their
place" as assigned by their race or (in this case) gender.

Some of [us] so-called bigots have [no] quarrel with 'deviancy' or
whatever but are
merely dismayed about a trampling of process and judicial codes.

Assuming I've correctly reconstructed your typo-mangled sentence above,
please note that my remark was clearly directed at Ron, not you. As much as
I disagree with many of your views, you have not resorted to bigoted slurs
or other personal insults in our conversation; you present contentful
arguments instead of ad hominem attacks.

Furthermore, I understand that there is a legitimate procedural concern
regarding the vote to adjourn. But I believe there is also a legitimate
principle that basic civil rights should be respected even in defiance of a
majority; and therefore a repeal of a basic right for a particular minority
group is not properly subject to a referendum. These two legitimate
principles conflict here. For me, the latter principle prevails, but I
understand how a reasonable person might disagree.

--Gary

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:26:33 +0000, Ron Lee wrote:
Next thing you will claim is normal is bestiality

Go Aggies !!!!
http://www.aggieathletics.com/